World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
I saw this headline and just assumed it was an anti-tourist thing, but I was wrong.
On a Monday morning, it's just nice to see that somewhere on this planet there are countries willing to take federal action to attack the hoarding and purposeful scarcity in housing created by a greedy few sons of bitches.
I expect housing scarcity to become the next problem that gets solved somewhere in the world while the US pretends it's unsolvable. (Not unlike homelessness and gun violence.)
The Spanish prime minister-- Pedro Sanchez-- is a political animal. He managed to maul and contain the far-right in a snap election he called. He has also spurred the economy and is growing, because he integrated many migrants well into the labour force. And even baser is that his government is pro-Palestine. All he had done in the past years granted him the political and social capital to enact policies that might ruffle the feathers of monied and powerful interests.
I hope Sanchez's government will survive any politicking against his progressive policies. The housing crisis is happening across the developed world, and oligarchs will propagandise the public into believing that the crisis is unsolvable, because resolving this will eat their bottomline.
My neighborhood i rent in is really expensive. I'm well off but not well off enough to ever be able to afford a house here. Especially not now with a one year old kid. My rent is $3500 but the cheapest house here would be at least $10000 (all expenses considered) a month on a 30 year mortgage.
Most of the people that live in the single family homes here are old with no kids. Most families with kids here rent.
Every so often I see one of the homes get all it's landscaping cleaned up, the house painted and sometimes an extension added onto it. Those are all the Airbnb's. Just a house that sits there empty for 3/4 weeks.
The other ones get torn down and turned into what I'd call a "box" house. Basically that ugly style of house that takes up the entire plot of land but still is only meant for one family. These are bought by the inherited wealth families that have a couple kids and want to get out of the main city but still don't want to live in the deep car dependent suburbs.
All of this because housing is used as an investment vehicle. From large corporations to individuals in retirement.
I really wish we could treat it for what it is. Shelter.
You may be interested in Community Land Trusts.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_land_trust
Agreed.
Yowza. I was fortunate to get my condo two years ago before this stuff accelerated to the point of hopelessness, and now that the US is having its credit downgraded, that was an even luckier thing to do.
AirBnB inflates housing prices, any regulation against it is pretty much always good for the locals
Only if you live somewhere people actually wanna go to :taps_head:
No matter where you live, AirBnB/VRBO can only make housing prices go up, never down. At best it'll be neutral. It's always taking inventory that might otherwise go to a local.
Otoh, it also provides jobs for the community, either directly (cleaning, handyman work, management) or indirectly (additional tourist dollars in local establishments).
The reality is, in almost all places, short term rentals have an extremely negligible impact on the housing market. And in the few places where they have a measurable impact, we need to ask: why can't that area just build more housing? And the answer, almost invariably, is restrictive zoning codes, coupled with land speculation. Solving the problem of lack of housing doesn't require banning short term rentals, an action which would likely have a significant negative impact on local businesses who rely on the tourist dollars. Solving the problem involves liberalizing zoning ordinances to allow more housing to be built, and adopting Georgist Land Value Taxes which preclude investors' ability to speculate on land value rather than only earning money via value they provide to other people.
Not all job creation is a net benefit to the public interest. Wars give lots of people jobs.
Dude the issue in Barcelona is that AirBNBs take up housing that's supposed to be occupied by supercomputer researchers. The city also already has plenty of Hotels. Licensed ones.
If more tourists want to come than there are hotel rooms tough luck why should Barcelona tank its economy for them. Barcelona is a city, not a theme park. The reason it's beautiful is not because it was built to attract tourists, but because it's an economical powerhouse run and lived in by people who value things like architecture and urban planning.
Take your tourism dollars and spend them in Extremadura, Barcelona won't mind. Great food there, nature, small places, little industry, Roman architecture, they can actually use that money.
My city has a snitch email, which you can contact and ask if a certain rental place is licensed
Already used it on two apartments my landlord is renting out. Turns out only one of them was properly licensed
How Britan almost solved the housing crisis
Thanks for this link. It's kind of amazing and I like it because it says what should be obvious to us all: public homes are a good idea.
To solve that you need to antagonize NIMBYs so I'm not hopeful.
There is no federal government in Spain, but yes, you are right. And by the way, housing scarcity has been the underlying problem to most economical divides and class discrimination since decades now.
Spain's government is more federal than federal governments like the German one. Spain's Autonomous regions have way more leeway and freedom than regions in federal governments.
Still, I don't think it is a federation. In Italy we got 5 indipendent statute regions as well, still not a federation.
By name it is not a federation (define federation..) Yet Spanish autonomies enjoy more autonomy than some federal states.
It is a nation including some regions given autonomy. I believe a federation by definition is comprised of exclusively equal member states forming common governmental organs.
Spains regions lack of their own police, tax collection (the German federal level doesn't even have a tax office), only partial cultural autonomy. Also the powers they have are only devolved, they're not guaranteed those rights.
German states are fully formed states in themselves, they have their own sovereignty, delegating the exercise of parts of it to the federal level just as EU member states delegate sovereignty to the EU. "Fully formed state" here meaning that they do not rely on the federal level for their administration, in fact living in Germany you generally don't come into contact with federal bureaucracy at all, it's all state or municipal level (district level is technically state level, they're devolved public bodies).
I'll grant you that among unitary states Spain is quite federal, but it's not "more federal than federal countries".
Spanish regions have their own police. These police forces are autonomous from the central ones. https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polic%C3%ADa_auton%C3%B3mica Some even have a specific name: Mossos, Ertzaintza, policia foral, etc..
The Spanish regions have autonomy on both collecting taxes, and assigning their own budgets. They are autonomous in the case of emergencies, healthcare, education (which allows them to set their culture), cultural ministeries,, with their own regional bodies that make their own decisions.
All this is more federal than the federal states of Germany. Signed, somebody from Spain that lives in Germany, and does come in contact with the federal government quite often.
All of that is things that German states have. Not sure what federal agency you're in contact with but it certainly isn't the Ausländeramt that's state-level.
Exactly. All of that things that Germany has, meanwhile Spain is not even a federation. Yet it has the same level or more of autonomy on its regions than a federation.
Found a paper (a bit older, 2001, but should still be mostly accurate) comparing the two. Cliff notes:
Thanks for sharing! This is an incredible comparison.
Ope, yeah. Forgot that Spain is a monarchy, but by federal I just mean 'nationwide'. Thanks.
You're not far off. We don't call it 'federal government' but in practice it's exactly that, in the same line that we call the prime minister 'presidente'.
Being a consitutional monarchy or republic doesn't have anything to do with federation.
Being a constitutional monarchy instead of a republic just means that they have a predesignated figurehead that represents the country, instead of electing that figurehead. The person is just a figurehead that rubberstamps things, but doesn't take decisions at all. Be it the king (in a constitutional monarchy like Spain, Norway, UK, Denmark, Sweden, etc) or however you want to call it (in a republic like France, Germany, etc).
The government gets elected.
Well it is an anti-tourist thing in the sense that regulations on AirBnBs and the like are meant to close the "hotel license" loophole. Touristy places generally don't mind new short-term accommodation and give out licenses like candy, likewise small places with relaxed property markets, non-touristy places are much more restrictive because they don't want to tank their economy.
For grandma in a village renting out some rooms to visitors getting delisted will result in her going to the municipality, asking for a license, getting one, and putting the listing up again. For an investor buying up apartments in big cities to illegally use as a hotel because renting long-term has lower ROI, well, they won't get a hotel license, their listings are going to stay down. If you want to build only hotels and have no long-term accommodation may I suggest building a theme park somewhere.
Your downvotes make me wonder if I misunderstood your post, but you seem to be saying that Spain's Airbnb regulations make it harder for people to buy flats with the intention of using them as short-term holiday lets, while not really stopping people who just want to rent a room in their own house for short periods. Which does sound good to me, given that those empty rooms in grandma's house wouldn't otherwise be on the market.
So is your point that this is "anti-tourist" in the sense that it does make things more difficult for tourists, but that should be expected given that tourists are generally indifferent to the long term negative effects of tourism on a city?
I'm not really acquainted with the details of how Spain does it but it's common practice in Europe to need a license for short-term rentals, it's usually municipal statute as an extension of zoning law. Details differ vastly depending on location because every municipality is different.
Before the days of AirBnB circumventing those municipal regulations was very hard as big hotels are kind of hard to hide, they're rather obvious, and if you have small apartments where are you going to get your renters from. AirBnB made it possible to get renters for small properties that fall under the radar of authorities. So requiring AirBnB to, effectively, ensure that what they list is licensed is closing that loophole.
The "anti-tourist" thing only really comes into play when municipalities are actually limiting the number of licenses they give out: When licenses are abundant it doesn't matter that you can skirt them with AirBnB. Cities like Barcelona do limit them, other places don't, as such only places like Barcelona had an actual problem with AirBnB, as such cracking down on AirBnB is helping the anti-tourist "agenda" of places like Barcelona. With agenda I mean allow people to continue to live and work in their own city doing something else but wipe tourist asses.