this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

Asklemmy

51102 readers
312 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Preference for high nutrient density and lower cost if possible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd have to digup stats but I think USA had higher diabetes due to everything being sugar, at least carbs like rice have to be digested and aren't instant sugar bomb

[โ€“] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, for sure. The US diet is horrible IME. Loads of sugar, salt, fried / hydrogenated oils in ultra-processed food. Absolutely crazy.

Meanwhile, the problem with white rice is not that it has simple carbs, but that it's little more than just starch, which has a fast, deleterious effect on blood glycemic levels. So for the cultures that eat white with almost every meal, it can be a real problem.

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like various studies show a link, but also wildly variable situation.

Such as south Asian population haveling diabetes correlation between even low rice intake while in didn't affect Chinese population.... But high rice consumption 70% or more of calories did.
Maybe Chinese genetics are different and tolerate it better.

Too many variables maybe.

There's probably a link of exercise, like decades ago being poor and burning off your rice sugar by walking and toiling the land was fine, but sitting in front of Netflix probably sucks for rice consumption.

Okay!
But... I mean, Sven-- we can try to get after this stuff specifically, but please try to understand that in terms of research studies, I'm a complete idiot.