this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
161 points (96.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

34912 readers
19 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If I'm writing C++, I'm usually optimizing for portability over performance, in which case I would prefer std::endl as it would yield the best results regardless of platform; it also keeps the end-of-line character out of other strings, making code just a little cleaner.

\n is for when I'm done pretending that anything that isn't Unix-like is OK, or I'm counting the cycles of every branch instruction.

[–] barubary@infosec.exchange 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

std::endl provides zero portability benefits. C++ does have a portable newline abstraction, but it is called \n, not endl.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago

Thank you two for demonstrating the image in the post so well.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, there's no guarantee that in every context \n is translated portably.

[–] barubary@infosec.exchange 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The same is true of std::endl. std::endl is simply defined as << '\n' << std::flush; nothing more, nothing less. In all cases where endl gives you a "properly translated" newline, so does \n.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahhh, I see. Looks like the magic happens somewhere further down in iostream.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's controlled by whether the stream's opened in text mode or binary mode. On Unix, they're the same, but on Windows, text mode has line ending conversion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They aren't the same thing so the comparison is weird.

endl has a flush which is important when doing something like embedded work or RTOS development. If i was doing multiple lines they all were \n until the last line when i actually want to push the buffer.

Obviously depending on the tuning of the compiler's optimization multiple flushes could be reduced but the goal should always be to write as optimal as possible.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

but the goal should always be to write as optimal as possible.

Within reason.

Over optimization is a curse on getting done.

[–] aport@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Who in the hell is using iostreams in an RTOS

[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago

Sometimes you work in a codebase that was decided on by others for reasons you don't know.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 6 days ago

Several. Probably dozens

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

\n, because I ordered a newline, not a flush.

[–] unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

std::endl is used in output streams in C++ to end the line, using the os specific line termination sequence, and flush the buffer.

The later one is a performance issue in many cases, why the use of "\n" is considered preferred

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Instead of this:

std::cout << "Hello world.\n";

You can do this:

std::cout << "Hello world." << endl;
[–] Daedskin@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

The fact that you used the namespace for cout but not for endl inordinately bothers me

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gon@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Boy am I glad I don’t do C++ anymore. That string handling with the overloaded bitshift operator was wild.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

From memory it's a way to declare a line ending after your string.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GideonBear@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

#define endl "\n"

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tourist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
/* I'm new to this language so just imagine there is a new line here when it prints: */
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] aport@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you a modem by any chance?

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

No, I'm a teapot

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah \r gang4lyfe

[–] lengau@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

os.linesep

Lol jk none of my stuff runs on Windows anyway

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] grandel@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I like that you added the absolute namespace identifier or whatever its called

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

I don't always namespace but when I do I fully qualify.

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago
[–] nope@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Environment.NewLine might exist in C#

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago

Microsoft really creating the problem and then forcing you to use their solution.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It might do. I encountered it last week as I needed it for a powershell script. So it exists in that at least

[–] bramen49@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Well, Java has System.lineSeparator so, maybe no?

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Rebel side \0

[–] dave@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Endl is faster to type

load more comments
view more: next ›