this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
923 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

2333 readers
326 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pseudonaut@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Works. DON’T TELL ANYONE OR ELSE THEYLL FIX IT.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

OMG it really does!!!

Fucking cheat code!

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 2 days ago (1 children)

equivalent of spraying graffiti to keep the rents down.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

9mm cartridges are about $0.25 each. Occasionally popping off about $2 worth can save you $400/mo.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did we just solve the rent/housing crisis?

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

"The Gang Solves The Housing Crisis"

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Also scares the shit out of my dog :(

But she’ll deal with it if we’re saving money because that’s more treats!

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I think you just made the most compelling case ever for liberals owning guns.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I had never imagined people killing boxes cost this little.

[–] deeferg@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only as long as the graffiti is bad/sloppy.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Well, I can't draw for shit so...

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure. Rich people don't want to live anywhere where poor people also live.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When I become a millionaire, I would live next door to rich people but in (apparently) dirty and ugly clothes. I would put three colours on the roof of my mansion and grow a hideous front yard.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Sounds good in theory, but most of the places rich people live have very strict code enforcement for how your house/yard can look. Then again, you can just take a note from Bezos with his illegal hedge fence and consider the fine part of your property tax.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 96 points 3 days ago (21 children)

I'm more surprised that people still use Google search at all after the years of enshittification — first the SEO crap, then "personalized search" bubbles, and finally the "AI" idiocy. Even shouting questions down a wishing well seems more productive at this point.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 107 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Not to sound confrontational, but you're way too focused on your - likely rather advanced - usage.

90% of people search for very simple stuff. They want to know the weather or want to know about that new movie they don't quite remember the name of. And for that use case, Google is perfectly serviceable. And since people are used to it, for example by it being the default on most platforms, they use it.

A lot of market leaders are objectively a bad choice, but they're a known brand. Coca cola, McDonald's, Oracle, etc.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you sound confrontational, but neither do I consider my internet searching particularly advanced. A lot of my searches are exactly what you describe, and a lot is trying to find a good research rabbit hole to go down. Call me curious.

I'm just sceptical, primarily of Google Search's inroads into surveillance monetisation and effective monopoly. For the same reasons I am as critical of the other "market leaders" you mention; I don't consider the ability to inspire brand loyalty in millions of consumers to sell crap products a quality 🤷

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would honestly consider anyone that uses Lemmy or the Fediverse to be more advanced than the average user.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (20 children)

Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, etc all suffer the same problems. I’d love to hear other alternatives (and I don’t mean alternatives like searx that is little more than lipstick on a pig and proxies search results from said engines).

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

DuckDuckGo is just Bing wearing a duck hat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Google supports searching "specific phrases", -excluding_words, +ensuring_keywords, and whatever * is. I havent found any other indexers that allow me to make use of searches with that level of detail, which is often the only way you can find specific things these days.

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

Duckduckgo does plenty with its advanced search operators, which are pretty similar to Google's. * is a wildcard, meaning if you were to search c*y, results word return something including a sequence beginning with 'c' and ending with 'y', but having any sequence of characters in between them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 49 points 2 days ago

just tested, works well. fuck

[–] Technoworcester@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Fuck me. That actually works.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Fuck!

Ok so I will do that going forward...

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Fucking great

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems like more work than installing ublock origin and using duck duck go.

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

duck duck go has been giving me AI summaries / suggestions

You can turn it off but if your cookies are cleared you have to do it again.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

I removed it using ublock

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I get around it by using Qwant

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like it’d be a worthwhile browser extension to insert that into every search.

[–] gnufuu@infosec.pub 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Huh, these are not the Laurel & Hardy films I used to watch ...

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Sudo apt install thefuck

No wait

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but that, uh, also alters her search results.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

-fuck

Seems to still work and not affect the search. In my limited testing that is. If this keeps working someone just needs to create a extension the auto adds -fuck to all searches.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

But what if I don't want to exclude "fuck?" That would filter out half of my code comments

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good luck searching for porn with that exclusion.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Google doesn't show AI for porn searches.

Bing continues to be the best porn search engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Not using Google is also an option. Especially when alternatives are better now.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago

I suppose we can empirically test that. Time to fuck around and find out i guess

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

Fuck it works pretty well too

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is magic!!!

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 13 points 3 days ago

This is gonna be fun

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

Or you could just...stop using Google?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›