this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
510 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

68772 readers
3459 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla (TSLA) has to replace the ‘self-driving’ computer inside about 4 million vehicles or likely compensate the owners of those vehicles.

The liability could be more significant than the largest automotive recall in terms of cost.

In 2016, Tesla claimed that all its vehicles in production going forward have “all the hardware necessary for full self-driving capability.”

Tesla’s use of the term “full self-driving” has changed over the years, but at the time and for years later, CEO Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving, which means unsupervised autonomous driving even with no one in the cars.

Almost 10 years later, this has yet to happen and won’t happen soon in most of the cars Tesla has delivered over the last decade.

Archive link: https://archive.is/kJO23

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

TLDR: the marketing lies about full self driving are problematic given the computers of the last few gens are only marginally more capable then a toaster. Some lawsuits have made Tesla pay up, many more might.

Opinion: do not let your car kill you. Do not use full self driving.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Full self driving isn't full self driving anyway. You're expected to sit in the drivers seat ready to take action anyway. Sucks that it kills people, but it's a problem with the marketing, not the tech which is comparable to other cars adaptive cruise with lane keep assist. Musk should be held fully responsible because the fact that it's a marketing issue makes it even worse to me.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Don't let your car kill other people, if your expensive deathtrap kills you I feel bad but I can't say it's unexpected.

[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

I'll take "things that might have happened if Elon didn't cut the department that relates self-driving" for $100, Alex.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 19 points 6 hours ago

Tesla: LOL our CEO owns the president.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

That tends to happen when everything's computer

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 160 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This is just one guy saying this. There's no judge or government ordering a recall.

It's clickbait.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Yep, my first thought on seeing this was ... 'and who will be enforcing this?'

No one, the answer is no one.

While the information about Elon's history of making false claims, hardware and software details are accurate... there is no official body that has ruled as the title of the article suggests.

A more accurate headline would be 'should' not 'has to'.

There is basically zero chance that this guy's desire would be effectuated in the US ... as the US agency that regulates cars... was recently gutted by Musk's DOGE idiots.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/04/car-safety-experts-at-nhtsa-which-regulates-tesla-axed-by-doge/

Maybe the EU or China or other governments could... legally agree with the author, and order a similar command...

But uh yeah, the Trump admin is currently blatantly telling the Supreme Court to go fuck themselves, the law will soon be whatever the hell Trump and his orbiters want it to be, has already told the entire world to go fuck themselves and also beg and grovel at the same time.

Elon would just... continue doing whatever the fuck he wants, even if another country mandated a recall/replacement.

Sorry, but uh yeah, we have a fascist government now, the rule of law is dead, the law is now whatever the fuck the Trump admin says it is.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

That agency apparently creates new safety regulations but doesn't do oversight. I think that's up to the courts? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago

'and who will be enforcing this?'

No one, as long as their CEO is President and dismantling all the organizations that were barely checking him in the first place.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 14 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, Musk got rid of the people who could actually tell him to do this.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

As another user said, it's just a random blogger that said this.

Musk quote:

I mean, I think the honest answer is that we’re going to have to upgrade people’s Hardware 3 computer for those that have bought full self-driving, and that is the honest answer and that’s going to be painful and difficult but we’ll get it done. Now I’m kind of glad that not that many people bought the FSD package.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 32 points 10 hours ago

Time to sell Tesla to xAI

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 35 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

At this point, I’m sure the plan is to let the HW3 cars age out before they could provide the upgrade. It worked on me, I sold my car a month ago without ever getting what I paid for. I look forward to joining the class action suit, but I doubt I’ll ever see a dime in compensation.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago

He is 100% gonna try and weasel out of this recall and paying compensation.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

One week before Tesla's earning call too.

I love this for Muskrat.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 hours ago

You forgot the third option, "Or ignore the courts."

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Tesla’s use of the term “full self-driving” has changed over the years, but at the time and for years later, CEO Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving, which means unsupervised autonomous driving even with no one in the cars.

Almost 10 years later, this has yet to happen and won’t happen soon in most of the cars Tesla has delivered over the last decade.

Well yes, he's a liar. https://elonmusk.today/

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 72 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Elon Musk claimed that it would mean Tesla owners would eventually receive a software update that would turn their vehicles into “robotaxis” capable of level-4-5 self-driving

Wait... so he actually knows what the standard levels 4 and 5 are??

:-)

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 39 points 13 hours ago

Maybe he asked his leveling guy from POE2?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Level 5 is easy to understand even for musk, it's a fully autonomous robot that requires no human supervision or intervention yet is capable of navigating every single possible traffic situation. That's what he has been claiming is just a few years away for over a decade.

And as long as he insists that the only sensors a tesla has are cameras, that goal is simply impossible, with cars driving under semi-truck trailers and through walls with pictures of the road painted on it.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Level 5 is easy to understand even for musk

Disagree.

He says "all" and he probably thinks "all", but the meaning of it is always "nearly all". I say, he is unable to grasp that the standard's requirement actually includes all the rare conditions that happen in the real world.

Rain, snow, thunderstorm, earthquake, vomit on the dashboard, no internet...

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

That's exactly it, he knows what it means - all. L5 is easy like that.

He's delusional thinking that he could ever actually achieve that, but that's why L5 is so much simpler of a concept than L4, as with L4 you can argue about semantics and details about what exactly it has to be able to do to qualify. Level 5 has no exceptions, it has to be completely autonomous with zero human interaction required other than telling it where you want to get to. If it can't do it, it isn't L5.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

He knows the words.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Can't tell you, that's Level 6 classified. Sorry bud.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

It is always a stock market manipulation grift.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago

He knows how to repeat sounds now! That's good.

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

That's going to cost quite a bit, what with tariffs on electronics and all. Wait, I had a tissue around here somewhere...

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 25 points 12 hours ago

Did you come as well?

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 hours ago

It's going to cost him nothing. Trump justs writes an executive order that the customers can go fuck themselves, and there's that.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 6 points 11 hours ago

It is right next to the world's tiniest violin

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Another day, another Tesla lawsuit.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And the company remains massively overvalued despite the recent falls in value. It has a long way to fall yet.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

Some people bet Elons political influance will benefit Tesla in the future.

Personally I doubt he cares about it.

Also, if they successfully transform the US into a dictatorship, money loses meaning for those in charge.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's the drawback when "everything's computer" in a Tesler

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

Was looking for this comment. Was not disappointed.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

You gotta love Tesler. It is all a computer.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Enjoy importing all the parts with the tariffs!

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Shit vehicles