this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
776 points (95.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

7532 readers
2198 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In this economy?

There's gotta be at least six figures worth of eggs in this photo

[–] ShooK@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

4 x 3 containing 30 eggs = 360 x 6 layers per pallet = 2160 x 4 pallets = 8640 / 12 per dz = 720 dozen eggs x $5 a dz = $3600. Considering these are brown eggs, they may be selling as free range organic bullshit for like $10 / dz so maybe $7200.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

Nothing makes a joke funnier than using math to poke holes in it lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Look man I know that my taxonomy doesn't work... but have you considered that it was created with the intent to work?

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Now say he's a featherless (female) biped and we're full circle

[–] Beardbuster@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A woman is one of those things where know you one when you see one. Doesn't have to be any more complex than that.

Like Jiminy Cricket said, "Let your conscience be your guide"

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's what I initially thought, too, but there are people who identify as a woman who 100% look like a man to me. It's rare, but it does happen, and I'm not going to argue with them about it.

If you say you're a woman, then you're a woman, and it shouldn't be any more complex than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They said "without excluding" not "without including"

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh, believe me, they don't want this egg selling man to be called a woman.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›