this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
1821 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

7966 readers
2572 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The average Trump supporter basically does think you can self finance your way out of this: Electricity and a/c isn't a necessity for living and people lived without that stuff 100 years ago. Internet isn't a necessity and neither is having a cell phone. Owning a vehicle isn't a necessity, simply walk or add 3+ hours a day you don't have to your commute waiting on public transportation. The average person is always fighting weight gain, so cut food costs with controlled ~~starvation~~ rationing. Deodorant, toilet paper and hygiene isn't a necessity either. Needless to say no one deserves to be happy and you should be spending no money on video games, eating out, or anything fun. But spend money on dating and having kids because our society definitely deserves you give them more workers. Also, privacy isn't a necessity too so if you aren't sharing a studio apartment with 4 other people you have nothing to complain about. If this is an issue than you should have chosen to get lucky and be rich, maybe pray about it too because God knows best.

This is unironically my boomer evangelical mother's opinion.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 120 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I bought my house in 2014, $224k at 4% APR, my monthly payment including taxes is $1400/mo.

It's only been 11 years, inflation is up ~35% in that time, so buying the same house now should be ~$1900/mo. Actual price if I were to buy it now? ~$3500/mo. And wages have barely budged. No wonder young people entering the workforce can't buy houses anymore.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly, though, that huge run-up in price is also half the reason why people think they need to own homes. We need to stop looking to homes to be the “engine of wealth creation” or we’re only asking for more of this.

The other half of the equation, of course, is wanting to have a stable home that you can control. And that’s still as valid as ever.

But homeownership isn’t necessarily the best choice for everyone. It reduces your mobility and optionality and it carries some risks and hidden costs.

But as long as everyone looks at it as the gateway to wealth, and feels like everyone is getting a piece of that action except them, it will contribute to the continuation of hyperinflation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suite403@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

We bought a house in Tampa Florida area in 2018, our monthly cost was $1400/month. Moved to Washington in 2022 and bought a house and the house is smaller and our monthly payment is $3k. Area matters of course, but comparably I'd imagine we're in similar situations.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 149 points 5 days ago (16 children)

Exactly. $400 for mine. $100 would fill a shopping cart with groceries back then. Health insurance: $80-125/mo. Internet: $15/mo. Garage sales almost everything was less than $10, most of it was less than $5. Goodwill was a deal. DIY/homemade was a deal, a way to save money.

It was a different time. There’s no equivalent to that time today, today is pretty awful.

And now it’s all going to be so much worse thanks to MAGA, oligarchs, and Heritage.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 74 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Yes, what is up with thrift stores charging almost the same as “first-hand” stores? Yet another example of how this generation is screwed (along with all of us old people).

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ive noticed this at chains, but not at my local stores. Goodwill for example, I always see dollar tree items marked as $2+. I know Theyre from dollar tree because theyre still in the damn package.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Or they somehow want to price things off eBay prices. Bro, you are a thrift store. You aren't some place that should be trying to get the absolute most out of an item.

Price it vaguely on what people might pay for some used, unwashed, beat to hell thing. If someone thinks they can get more by selling it online, that's fine. That's on them. You don't have to compete with them. Turnover of items is more important than the most money on that old glass cup.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago (11 children)

There's a famous Agatha Christie quote where she mentions that when she was young, she never imagined she'd be rich enough to own an automobile or poor enough to not have servants in her house. At some point, the affordability of one shot way past the other.

In my lifetime, I've seen huge cost increases in housing, and huge cost decreases in most technological products. When I was a kid, the normal TV size was something like 20 inches, and cost more than a month's rent for a typical apartment. In 1990, the average rent was $447, according to this. I found a Sears catalog from 1989 with a 25 inch TV selling for $549, and a 20 inch TV for $318. It would be hard to convince someone from 1990 that one day the cheapest, shittiest apartments in the poorest neighborhoods would rent for more than a 60-inch TV per month. Or that the typical ambulance ride costs something like a month's salary of a factory worker.

That's the real problem with old people's sense of money. The human tendency is to assume that all products cost the same multiple of those products prices in their early adulthood, so the luxury products of their youth remain the luxury products of today. These old people are stuck in some kind of Agatha Christie style of cost comparison, without the self awareness, and thinking that someone who owns a cell phone should be able to afford to buy a single family detached house, or couldn't possibly be bankrupted by a single Emergency Room visit.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 69 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is this the original unmodified drawing? What a dump truck on the lad.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CulturedLout@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago

We had to give up entirely on affording a house. There are ROOMS for rent at $1200 here. This used to be a low COL area until COVID. We had low infection rates so a ton of people moved here and we don't have the infrastructure to support them. We've been priced out of what living space we did have and since there's still the illusion it's cheap to live here, it's almost impossible to get a living wage.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Saving money on food to buy a guillotine is personal finance.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Have you tried simply having more money?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Please, I'm begging you, please call Habitat for Humanity. Don't make assumptions based on what you think you know about the program or have heard, just fucking call.

Worst case scenario: You spend an hour at the initial meeting and discover it won't work for you. The other scenario: You end up owning a brand new home (or one refurbished to brand new) at cost.

Because my es-wife picked up the phone, I now own my own home at $600/mo., 19-year mortgage. Took us right at a year to complete the program and have keys in hand.

Be glad to answer questions, but there are variations according to the local outfit's way of doing things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Landlords are not greedy. They are inherently parasitic.

load more comments (1 replies)

I used to pay $1100 for a 3 bedroom apartment 10 years ago, now a 2 bedroom is $2600+

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (15 children)

My parents, 35000 dollars for a two bedroom, 1 bath house 3 acres of land in the middle of BFE back in the 80's

Today, 3 bed, 1 bath house with less than .25 acres, 200k same BFE area.

With inflation something comparable to my parents house in BFE, because it's not changed all that much, should only be 100k.

And the recent minimum wage increase to 13.75 an hour passed by the people is in process of being revoked by Republicans.

And I do get tired of visiting home and taking to people that spout off the 'back in my day' bs.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Having taken the point of this post as it was intended, we can also recognize that learning how to manage your money is in fact always a good thing. Will basic hygiene undo generations of economics? No, but we certainly shouldn’t NOT teach young people to manage their money.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nobody on earth has suggested we stop teaching economic literacy. We should however stop pretending it is sufficient. We require systemic change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 31 points 4 days ago

"Greedy landlords" is an easy cope out. Instead we should realize the system that's built to continously inflate the economy whereas our wages stagnate at best.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 days ago

All CEOs are bastards or something

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My first apartment (without roommates) was $600/month I think. I just check the present day at it rents for $1400! The mortgage cost on my first house (small/low cost of living area) was only $1000/month.

I just don't know how young people are affording housing these days.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 days ago

Well, most don't. Just let them enjoy abuse at home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago

No one wants to work (for nothing) anymore!

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I started at $1,400 in 2011. That went up to $3,200 by 2023 for the cheapest place in a worse part of town.

I had to move to an entirely different city. Fuck San Diego. Shitty ass city.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

But this flies in the face of the great American delusion that everyone can white knuckle their way through large crises arising from systemic failures or engineered on purpose by oligarchs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›