this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
74 points (97.4% liked)

World News

48410 readers
2267 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As usual, motornormative loaded language downplaying the agency of the driver. It's never "person drives car into pedestrians;" it's always "car hits pedestrians" as if it's some inevitable thing that "just happens."

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that it will be a legal protection thing.

If you say that the car hit the pedestrians then that cannot be disputed.

If you say that the driver drove into the pedestrians then you could be sued if it was later proven to be mechanical failure.

Even if it was pretty obviously intentional you don’t want to leave that decision up to the reporter. You need to wait until you are 100% sure which would only come upon conviction.

[–] LadyButterfly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, or if it turns out he had a seizure at the wheel or something

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

I saw a video of this, and he veers from one side of the street to the other, and then back again - and it looks like he's deliberately targeting whichever side had more people at that point.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 17 points 1 month ago

I just wanna say that I really dislike this new trend of mowing crowds down with cars just because you’re a bigot.

[–] LadyButterfly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is awful news. My concern is it's lone actor grievance fuelled violence. He even hurt kids

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago