this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
237 points (98.4% liked)

Actually Infuriating

631 readers
18 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

But piracy is a crime...

EDIT: This guy is a clown

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it's only piracy when poor people do it?

[–] jyl@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poor people aren't "running an industry"

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Napster was…but it wasn’t owned by rich people and didn’t benefit rich people so it was targeted.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

Sounds okay to me. Fuck the AI industry.

[–] jyl@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 week ago

Asking banks for permission would kill the robbery imdustry.

[–] Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then let AI die. What has it done, other than make us stupider?

[–] natecox@programming.dev 27 points 1 week ago

Hey now, be fair; It’s guzzled down all of our water too.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Kill the artist industry. Oh yeah, rich cunts in England think art isn't a real career

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless you're friends with the right people.

[–] Soliae@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI has brought nothing of value to the table. Just another grift.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

If anything, it's delgitimized the actually useful ML projects in medicine and data processing.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't actually kill AI, it would just kill any open source solution and create a monopoly for the handful of companies that either have all the data or can afford to pay for it.

There's like 5 publishing houses, 3 record companies and a couple of websites that "own" almost all training material.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol lmao

That's only if they want to try tonprofit off of it.

Free use still allows you to train your own AI.

And the tech would be better if nobody profited off of AI

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Copy left license would be the best scenario but I don't think that is what we are getting sadly. That being said, you need the big foundational models. The average individual cannot train their own AI from scratch.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago
[–] irq0@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago

You're saying that like it's a bad thing?

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Isn't it true that historically when universities trained these things, they used their own data, "not randos on the internet" or "anything that wasn't nailed down" (random scraped copyrighted content).

GenAI could be ethical, it just, isn't, because corporations are assholes.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

Then it deserves to die.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Don't tempt me with a good time

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Then it should die.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 week ago

If it kills the ai industry thats fine. They can't survive in our current system with IP laws they shouldn't survive.

[–] PixelTron@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Nick Clegg can go fuck himself!

The solution presents itself!

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

scribbles notes Oh good!

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Dunno who this guy is, but he's either a techbro or doesnt know what hes talking about. It will kill LLM's and the art bots that work by stealing data, but thats not how all AI is trained. Make actual AI and not theft-bot and you wont have that problem.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is how I feel about banks and money

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You mean how laws stop the theft industry, and the murder industry... Like they should

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Took a minute to figure out that this wasn't https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Clegg 🙀

Edit: Okay turns out it is the nick the useless clegg i thought it was some namesake since the photo in article looked different to what i remember... Wow what a bastard...

[–] dehyzer@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...but it is that Nick Clegg

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What what?! 😦 Looks like i lived under a rock 🤯

[–] ratel@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is, unfortunately.

As policy makers in the UK weigh how to regulate the AI industry, Nick Clegg, former UK deputy prime minister and former Meta executive, claimed a push for artist consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Oh wow 😯😳 okay i lived under a rock, did not see that happening 😞