this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
139 points (77.3% liked)

Games

39528 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zymagoras777@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

..and that's why you support decent indie developers and pirate this trash

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 4 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, it doesn't surprise me.

Just gonna be another torrent for me.

Fuck these hypocrites. They're all greedy, entitled consumerists.

[–] bizza@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Avowed was cool but not really worth the 70. I doubt TOW2 is worth 80, and specifically especially because Microsoft/ActiBlizzard is just following the Nintendo train, which is what everyone knew was going to happen with triple A studios.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

$80? No problem! 🏴‍☠️

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, it just modern Obsidian, no one is going to buy it anyway.

Came and went.

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

It's crazy to think that a handful of people who have floated around Obsidian/Interplay/Black Isle have created (in my opinion) some of the best games to have ever existed.

You put a name like Chris Avellone or Tim Cain onto a project and I'm going to pay more attention to it than any AAA with millions put into trailers and other bullshit to sell you down the river.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 127 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This Thread-

"We should improve gaming somewhat"

"Just don't buy the game!"

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, yeah.

Vote with your wallet. I improved gaming by not buying a Switch 2.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago

Thank you for your contribution.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

That's sort of how it works though isn't it? If games at $80 are too much then less people will buy, profits will drop and publishers will either lower prices, or vanish and get replaced by ones that lower prices.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

How dare you use economic theory against them!?

Don't you realize gamers are supposed to be stupid children who will gladly pay whatever price is asked of them?

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

pretty sure AA and AAA studio execs can also organize and collectively agree on an $80 or higher price tag until it eventually sticks

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's the thing, there are already vendors doing largely what. Indies generally:

  • cost less
  • release in a playable state
  • take risks on new ideas
  • don't have microtransactions

But people usually talk about big AAA games in these complaints. Buy indies and we'll end up with more variety.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I buy mostly indies now, usually on gog or itch too.

But sometimes on steam if it's multiplayer.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 126 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'm not going to bother reading the article, because you can both be anti-capitalist and participate in the system as it exists today. The developers can't pay rent with good vibes.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The developers can’t pay rent with good vibes.

They can consume less and live in cheaper areas.

But why would they unless they're forced to?

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly they should just make their own coffee and cut the avocado toast right?

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That would be a start.

They should also stop subscribing to dumb shit like netflix and spotify. Instead of using doordash, they should get comfortable making their own meals.

We can't expect the system to change unless a majority of its participants are willing to change.

It's a cultural problem, and people like you are doing your part to make sure it never gets solved.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -1 points 3 hours ago

Thank you for the compliment.

My generation is full of morons so it's nice to be seen as different from them.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 83 points 2 days ago

Also the developers don't set the price

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, for starters, games are going to get more expensive.

That is their prerogative. Mine is not buying overpriced games.

That's always been the case. They can charge whatever they like, I'll only buy if I think the price is worth it.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Play that years down the line. The first one was OK but I paid like $15 for it with the expansion. Obsidian hasn't had a clear jump in quality since the MS purchase. Possibly even signs of writing regression with Avowed so can't imagine much hype for this game

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Grounded is fun, and 2 is right around the corner, though they did (and plan similarly for 2) to release it in phases in early access and gather community feedback at every step

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"Capitalism is when pay money for things. I am very smart."

Jesus Christ, I am begging people to actually learn what capitalism is before writing takes likes this.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago

I think it has more to do with how much they're charging rather than them charging anything at all.

i.e. They're maximizing profit off of people's low standards by charging the most people are willing to pay while giving the least they're willing to accept.

If this honestly had to be spelled out for you and you're not just being willfully ignorant, you should really get some remedial education before shitting on others.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm sure if it was up to the developers and creative minds behind the game this would have never been an issue. Sure, things like inflation have made the process of making games more expensive, but it's not like the extra money is going to actually go back to the developers. I'm so sick of this "games are more expensive to make" bullshit while they treat their employees like garbage and make them work ungodly hours. Micro$oft makes more money in one day than most of us or any of the developers will ever see in our entire lifetimes yet they need to lecture us on why we need to give them more money.

To be clear, I hold no grudge against the actual developers of this game. The first one was pretty decent and I'm sure this next one will be relatively good as well. But remember that we are talking about the company that forced Arkane to make Redfall when they had no desire to make it, and after it failed fired everyone at Arkane Austin and closed the studio. This isn't about making their money back to cover the cost of development, it's about making as much profit as possible with the least amount of effort possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 43 points 2 days ago

Capitalism deals with industry being owned privately.

If you want to complain about Microsoft being a publicly-traded, private-sector company rather than a worker cooperative or part of the government or whatever, okay, at least I can see where you're coming from.

But a socialist economy is perfectly compatible with having high prices.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Microsoft doesn't expect anyone to pay $80. They expect people to sub to Game Pass instead.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh yes, perpetually renting access and being beholden to price hikes "just because."

Makes sense all the morons who subscribe to netflix and spotify are also stupid enough to shill game pass.

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago

That's even worse.

[–] katze@lemmy.cafe 16 points 2 days ago

I guess the author learned that being anti-capitalist is somewhat trendy and couldn't resist writing this opus. But this has nothing to do with the game or games in general.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Of course you can - if an adequate share of that money goes to the devs, the only issue is the money that doesn't go to the devs. And they very likely don't have much control over that money

load more comments
view more: next ›