this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
720 points (99.5% liked)

News

30835 readers
3122 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s lawyers claim they’ve found a loophole that will allow Trump to ship immigrants overseas to be tortured.

Federal law states that the United States shall not “expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture.” This law implements a treaty, known as the Convention Against Torture, which the United States ratified more than three decades ago.

Federal regulations, moreover, provide that even after an immigration judge has determined that a noncitizen may be deported to another country, that judge’s order “shall not be executed in circumstances that would violate Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture.” And those regulations also establish a process that immigrants can use to raise concerns with an immigration judge that they may be tortured if sent to a specific country.

The Trump administration, however, claims it has discovered a loophole that renders all of these legal protections worthless, and is now asking the Supreme Court to explicitly give it the authority to make use of that loophole in order to enact its immigration policies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 287 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

Trump has a team of people who dedicated time, energy, and resources, to find a loophole around a ban on torture.

That sums up this administration's direction pretty succinctly.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 70 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

I agree, but there’s a difference. Trump is a figurehead. It’s not his team. Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation are the “deep state” that the right voters were convinced were controlling them through the dems. Peter Thiel, Putin, the Koch, Scaife, Uihlein, Bradley families and/or foundations, Barre Seid, Leonard Leo, Coors, Walmart, Exxon mobile, etc etc they’re all financing and guiding the hydra.

Trump goes away and Peter Thiel wormtongues Vance into doing the same shit

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Totally agree with what you said. It was just easier to get a point across pointing at TrumpCo.

No way in hell he's top dog in this shit show, just a gullible fool of hate and piss.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago

I can't wait for Nuremberg 2: electric boogaloo

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

As always, the cruelty is the point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 114 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Obama pardoning the Bush admin for torture was seen as weak and pathetic at the time, and its worse now.

He should have thrown the book at Bush and co.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 34 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Obama should have done a lot of things. I'm happy he did Obamacare but man he could have been so much more. Such a wasted chance. And making Biden his VP was a catastrophic error. Biden sabotaged the shit out of everything he touched.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Did Biden really have that much influence? I think it can be hard to assess how influential a VP is/was.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

I don't think it's so much about what he did as VP as much as the fact that his time as VP kind of set him up to run for president later.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Obamacare despite the Republicans throwing the mother of all tantrums about it was such a weak half assed piece of legislation. It was literally a Republican policy before Obama stole it and rebranded it. What he ran on and promised was a proper single payer healthcare the same as the rest of the world has. What we got was a federal search engine for insurance policies and very minor guarantees of what those policies will cover (and even that small gain is increasingly in danger of being removed).

Obama was one of the least offensive presidents of recent memory, but that's far from being a good president. He certainly did some good things, but not as many as his reputation would make you think.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 89 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Orange hitler needs to be impeached, removed from office, and sent to prison for his previous and current crimes.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 41 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I was hoping this would happen after his first term. However it will never, ever, EVER, happen. There just isn't anyone with a spine who will do anything about him.

Now I'm hoping he gets a debilitating stroke/heart attack.
Or a long painful death. Colon cancer is fine, anything that can't be treated.
Last resort is assassination, not because I'm above such things or find it distasteful etc. I was, but not anymore. No, it's because if that happens then it'll probably be quick and painless. And that racist rapist kiddie fiddler doesn't fucking deserve that mercy.

Assassination would stop him from hurting people quicker than cancer. Even if he had a stroke that debilitated him he wouldn't get impeached, he'd just effectively be a more obedient puppet.

Not to mention, assassination sends a message to his peers too. As much as I want him to suffer, I think a quick assassination would be more effective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 66 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there no evil idea these guys don't love?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

You could look at it from the perspective of the moral foundations.

  • Care/harm✅
  • Fairness/cheating✅
  • Loyalty?/betrayal?
  • Authority?/subversion?
  • Sanctity?/degradation?
  • Liberty/oppression✅

Only about half of these are clear to me. I think Trump needs to step up his game if he wants to get to the worst outcome possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 54 points 4 weeks ago

If you face torture or deathcamps, It's better to go out shooting.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 48 points 4 weeks ago
[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you’re on the side of torture, you’re one of the bad guys

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can we not relitigate this. I remember this from like 18 years ago. It was not a good time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 36 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Trump’s lawyers claim they’ve found a loophole that will allow Trump to ship immigrants overseas to be tortured.

Legal or not, why are you looking for excuses to torture people?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 4 weeks ago

To torture people, of course.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 35 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

According to President Donald Trump’s lawyers, the administration can simply wait until after an immigration judge has conducted the proceeding that ordinarily would determine whether a particular noncitizen may be deported to a particular country, and then, if that noncitizen is allowed to be deported, announce that the immigrant will be deported to some previously unmentioned country — even if that immigrant reasonably fears they will be tortured in that nation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 35 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

We should have Trump dragged through the streets by a Tesla.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 24 points 4 weeks ago

Just what we need to put in the hands of this Orange piece of human shit.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

extraordinary rendition meets enhanced interrogation, I guess.

Sean Hannity still hasn't been waterboarded for charity.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Lupus@feddit.org 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And immediately admitting he was wrong about it not being torture.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It absolutely is torture. I’ve experienced consensual waterboarding myself and even if you are doing it willingly and are mentally prepared, consenting to it - it is absolutely terrifying. Your brain screams at you, just pumps your body full of fear chemicals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 22 points 4 weeks ago

Pretty tough talk from the orange dude that vociferously whines about reporters asking "nasty" questions.

[–] Dillenger69@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd be happy if he got his wish and then magically disappeared and we heard rumors of him being waterboarded for fun. I'd do it myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 weeks ago

Geneva Suggestions

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Haven't they already been doing this in Guantanamo?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

We’re so fucked.

[–] Xtallll@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

So his loop hole is when a judge says the government can't send someone to Country A to be tortured, send them to Country B to be tortured with out asking a judge.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

See, this is why gwb and his cronies should have been prosecuted.

Instead, centrists were delighted when harris got dick cheney's endorsement, and were upset when gwb declined to endorse.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

Weird, why would he want to do that.

[–] RealSpiderLane@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

reads headline

WHYYYYYYYYUUHHHHH

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)

WHYYYYYYYYUUHHHHH

Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.

George Orwell, 1984

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Triflingmagoo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago

Orange man is really leaning into this role of authoritarian dictator, isn’t he?

[–] ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The U.S. has been doing stuff like this for a while in the war against terrorism, e.g. transporting suspects to other countries where they can be tortured for information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

yeah. The civil war is starting.

[–] don@lemm.ee 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Enough fucking around. CWII now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments