this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
811 points (94.8% liked)

196

3664 readers
1371 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gorge@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago

Why did you post a Bristol stool chart?

[–] Defectus@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

In real estate assets alone, thanks to his pops

[–] Nounka@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Some off them i see more as unfawfull ( when noboddy is looking ) evil

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

Lawful evil

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 47 points 1 day ago

Yeah, there is a convicted felon and an illegal immigrant right there.

I guess it’s meant to say the law is whatever they say it is.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Remember there's the neutral axis

Some are chaotic neutral. They're not out to wreck stuff, they just don't care if they do

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 230 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trump is a felon, so I am not sure "lawful" is the best fit.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The lawful/chaotic axis represents a person's willingness to follow an external set of rules against their own instincts or opinions. Having a pocket judge or a pocket president to legitimize one's actions does not make that person lawful.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump isn't a felon... He's a multi-felon.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Also ~~a convicted rapist~~ found responsible in a civil rape trial.

Pedants.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People who multi class are the worst.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

He's definitely chaotic evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

unless by lawful you mean they manipulate the law however they please with their money and connections, then no.

um, yeah. that's literally the difference.

lawful evil is "evil in a suit and tie" while chaotic evil is "monstrous, uncivilized evil."

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's the entire schtick of lawful evil. Manipulation, extortion, background deals, and all that.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You miss the point of the law

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fun fact none of them are lawful

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 37 points 1 day ago

They paid congress a lot of money to say that they actually are lawfull

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In the d&d alignment chart they are because capitalists have no inherent power outside of the laws that enforce their property. Devils in D&D will always break the rules(and rebel) if they think they can get away with it.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Huh? Devils are the corporate "trap you in fineprint and kill you with subclauses" type of evil. They are the ones who sell you the monkey's paw and come to collect your soul no matter how it shakes out. Catching them in airtight clauses (or narrow loopholes) is famously how you screw over devils.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd put Trump and Musk into 'chaotic'

Definitely evil though.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

No need to describe them in any way but just ...

Evil

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hahahahaha Hahaha haha "Lawful"

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump is more Chaotic Evil

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Facts. D&D defines the chaotic/lawful divide as whether or not the character abides by a code, ethos, or set of rules. So not "Law" in the "Legal Eagle Law Team" kind of way. Chaotic Evil characters don't really play by any rules, are unpredictable, and are just plain the worst.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slightly debatable which version of evil is the worst. I'd agree that I'd probably rather have a Lawful Evil head of state right now than what we've got.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Gul Dukat: What I did, I did to make Cardassia strong again.

https://youtu.be/6j71KvBXSXI (~4:00 minute mark)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

It's why he's not a billionaire. Zing!

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A couple of them might be chaotic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laserm@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Nah, don't forget that DJT is a convicted felon.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago

As in can dictate law

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago

As in “full of law”

Like, just jam-packed stuffed to the gills with law, to the point where they vomit law out into the world and we all boil to death slowly in their law-infused stomach acid

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This only counts because they use their money to make their lives "lawful" through legislation and capture of the courts, minimizing their very real crimes against humanity.

Okay perhaps Buffett, Gates, and Cook haven't gone as far as actual crimes against humanity but the rest have, and Buffett, Gates, and Cook are still unlawful but used their money to twist the laws in their favor.

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

By definition you can not get this rich without stealing the value of peoples labour - at scale.

Aka evil as shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›