this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1292 points (98.2% liked)

politics

24382 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Useless. Time for the Social Democrats to form their own party.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

Jesus McFucking Christ.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still "both sides are not the same"? Even if Democrats have slight majority in both or either houses, they still dilute policies to appease the fascists from stonewalling. Meanwhile, the fascists legislate every unspeakable evil policies and Democrats don't even try to resist as opposition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah, and all of these 128 Democrats will be very disappointed about something evil that the chertondoes later and "wish they would have voted differently"

Fuck all of them

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 143 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago (8 children)

"If it won't be successful, then work against it instead of showing support!"

Dems

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 129 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Looks like there are 212 Democrat reps in the house, which puts it at a large majority which would rather “not cause a fuss” or whatever the fuck excuse they’re trying to bullshit this time.

Useless people. Worthless people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (30 children)

Primary. Every. Single. One.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Really disappointed in my Congress woman, Sarah Elfreth. I wrote her an email and she responded with basically “that’s what they told me to do!”

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 29 points 2 days ago

Gotta share a screenshot of that email if it actually gives any detail, basically confirming the system rigging and complacency from members of said system, send it to some independent journalist or something.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Reply with "So what is the point of you?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Nobody who said "blue no matter who" in 2024 is allowed to say "what the actual fuck" at this.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

The day Americans realized no one was coming to save them 🫂

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 96 points 2 days ago (8 children)

But they impeached him before, so their stance is that he got better and is no longer a threat to democracy?

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They just don't feel the need to hide anymore. Most of your "Democrats" are just Republicans with a different paint job.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 22 points 1 day ago

I knew both sides were bad, but I didn't realize the rot was infested this badly.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] meangreenbeans@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Democrat and republican parties are the same party.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bizza@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

He's already been impeached twice in his previous presidency, he shouldn't even be sitting where he's at

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is a new website tracking whether politicians will go on the record to be against bribery.

I wonder if they will note this?

https://www.broad-center.com/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Is there a list of names? Because if any of my reps show up on this list, I will never vote for them again.

I don't want these fucking dinosaurs running the goddamn party anymore. I want some progressives with teeth who have the backbone to fight the fascists head on. I don't care how petty or how low they have to get, I want to see them at least try.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Called it. People need to set their expectations way lower so they aren't so pissed off about the lack of action from this party. They should also read up on the legal precedents that were going to sink these articles to begin with. Democrats would have a much better chance to impeach some of the Donvict's shitty cabinet members, (Pete Hegseth, ICE Barbie, RFK, DOGE) for clearly impeachable offenses, but decided to swan dive into an empty concrete pool. So there is still no sound strategy from the democrats on how to dismantle this nightmare and only pissing the public off with limp wristed slaps.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Maybe we shouldn't lower our expectations and instead remove everyone from the Democratic party that doesn't meet out expectations.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Put him in a bigger peach this time, so he can't get out

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Representative Mike Lawler, a New York Republican, wrote on X: "This is absurd on its face. The United States has not declared war since 1942 and has conducted over 125 different military actions since that time, including in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Presidents of both parties have relied on Article II authority, as well as AUMFs [Authorizations for Use of Military Force], to conduct targeted strikes and have not been subject to impeachment. In 2011, Barack Obama conducted an 8 month campaign in Libya to topple Gaddafi."

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We should have never been involved in any of that shit since WW2. 125 bad decisions don't justify an additional bad decision.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This goes to show that the problem isn't Trump or the Republicans, the problem is the United States of America. The only way things are going to get better is if America is removed from its position of global power and influence. If you care about fighting fascism and tyranny, you need to boycott American products, refuse to work for American companies and, if you're already working for an American company and can't quit, drop your productivity as far as possible. Do everything in your power to damage the American economy and reduce their power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There are probably a dozen things they could (and should) impeach Trump for. This isn't actually one of them. Presidents are authorized to do air strikes.

The left is usually not as ignorant of the facts as the right, but this is one of those cases where the left is ignoring the facts. The President has authorization from Congress to do limited military action. Should all of the Presidents before been impeached for doing similar one-off air strikes? Seems you want to impeach Trump based on dumb memes about this being the start of WWIII rather it being an air strike.

Did Obama get impeached for sending a SEAL Team into Pakistan without getting authorization from congress?

Also Iran does in fact have a nuclear weapons program. The civilian reactor is supplied Uranium from Russia that's already enriched to around 5% which is what you use for civilian energy generation. Iran had Uranium enriched to 60% which isn't useful for civilian reactors and none of the Uranium enriched in Iran is used in their one civilian nuclear reactor. The UN has reported that Iran is keeping secrets from them and there's been an increase in their Uranium enrichment, which again is entirely a weapons program, the uranium for civilian use comes from Russia.

So congratulations, instead of impeaching Trump for doing all of the corruption, or for deploying Marines on US soil without authorization, or for falsely declaring everything an emergency so he can do stupid tariff stuff, you've created a narrative that the left tried to impeach him for protecting Americans from the "Death to America" country's nuclear weapons. I guess the left is fine with the corruption and deploying the military within the US, but only take action to come to the defense of the Ayatollah's nuclear weapons program.

The left only seems to want to attack Trump when they have non-existent chance of winning or even convincing anyone of their position. On issues where the left has a strong case, they do nothing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›