this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
312 points (87.0% liked)

Canada

10069 readers
583 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How to say Marx was right without saying "Marx was right".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to big corporations effectively owning governments and big politicians the world over, things aren't bound to get better anytime soon, because "the economy". Fuck that shit

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And thank the Saudis too. Guess where the previous conference on phasing out fossil fuel, but agreed to slow down the process, was held.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All that's left is to make the rich suffer.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

“The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”

~Utah Phillips

Inb4 some pedant quibbles that "the planet itself is not dying." Yeah, but we and our fellow creatures are. It should be understood that is what Mr. Phillips meant.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

1950's oil execs funded studies that show how they will kill the planet if they don't stop, transition to something else, hell they had enough fore warning they could have R&D'd solar and monopolize the tech, but NO! They needed to make faster money faster and stopping yourself from killing the human race isn't THAT important, and they knew they'd be dead by now.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

They might have been able to monopolize SOME of the tech, but they knew they could never own access to the sun. But yeah, they knew that they were incinerating us for decades. Which makes it premeditated murder in my books.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Has been for ages. It's now question of how bad, and we are still making it worse.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’m sick of this WE, im not a billionaire pumping more Co2 per day with my yacht fleet than a town of people do in their life. I’m sick of being blamed for this shit, when all my conservation is undone in a minute by a corporation. I refuse to take equal blame any longer

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Good point. I try my best, but even if like 90 % of the population tried harder, it would barely offset the billionaire companies killing our planet.

They're the problem, always has been that way.

I think it's time to stop them.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This simply isn’t correct. While the billionaires yacht fleet and jet setting make them have insane carbon footprints individually, it is their business practices that actually register in terms of contributing significant chunks of the carbon budget for humanity. Bezo’s jets and yachts pale in comparison to Amazons delivery fleet and manufacturing all that junk. It’s counterproductive to focus on their personal emissions, when it’s the interaction of their businesses, government, and consumers that are burning the earth. We have 2 levers on that problem.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You're right. I was thinking more about the individuals responsible capture and refining of fossil fuels.

But the pretty ubiquitous use of Amazon delivery does greatly contribute a lot. Didn't really think about it in that aspect. Thanks for pointing that out.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The best we can do for the planet is toss a few billionaires into a volcano as a sacrifice to earth

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago

Now that's some carbon sequestration

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Well, one way in which we can help fight against climate change is by not eating meat or dairy products.

For anyone curious about the subject, there's some good science backing that up, though the links I'm providing are lazy DDG searches, so if anyone wants to do it, they can probably find better sources out there with more information.

The average cow can produce somewhere between 100-500 litres of methane a day, which is 23 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Alfalfa and other grass hays is a crop that used a crazy amount of water, and it's grown primarily to feed cows.

Going vegan, or at least mostly vegan, is the way to go. Can start with going vegetarian and at least swapping out meat sources. Alternative vegan protein sources

With that being said, I do not practice what I preach. I should, though.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again though, I do all these things and it doesn’t matter cause my entire life’s output of CO2 is being put out by one guy in an hour. I’m turning off lights and corporate buildings are running all the lights and AC 24/7

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The actual problem is democratic oligarchism/zionism/neocon warmongering/US colonialism. Protecting establishment is easily supported when higher priorities than human sustainability can be manufactured. The more miserable you are made, the less you care about "higher level Maslow hierarchy needs" at political level.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And we're gonna increasingly train more AI, mine more crypto, open more coal mines, industrially kill more animals, fight more wars.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 195 points 3 days ago (23 children)

Let's be clear about something; climate scientists almost universally agree that there is no such thing as "winning" or "losing" the fight against climate change (Suzuki, for the record, is a zoologist, not a climate scientist). This isn't a game, there's no referee, and no one gets a trophy at the end.

The battle against climate change is about mitigating harm. The worse we do, the more harm there will be. But there is never a point where it is "too late". The car is going to crash, but the sooner you hit the brakes, the less damaging the impact will be. Everything we do to push the needle will save lives. There is never a point where we get to throw up our hands and succumb to the comforting fantasy that it's "too late" to change anything.

I have a lot of respect for Suzuki, and I don't blame him for feeling defeated with everything that's happening, but spreading this kind of message is, dangerous, damaging, and flies entirely in the face of the science.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Back before George W Bush directed NASA to call it climate change, it was called global warming, and you can definitely win against that - by stopping the earth from warming. That's unwinnable due to feedback loops that have now begun.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

Does not remotely address my point. We can always - always - work to reduce the harm caused by climate change.

The point where the harm could be reduced to "none" is decades past us. If that's the point where you give up then fuck off. Climate change is actively causing harm as we speak, and it is still worth fighting. We can still make life better for ourselves and future generations.

The notion that climate change is some kind of runaway engine that will continue amok without any further human input is nonsense. Yes, I'm aware of ideas like "Permafrost methane bombs" and I've also done enough research to be aware that only a small fringe of climate scientists actually support those ideas. They're flashy and exciting and get big press, but they are not widely accepted climate science.

What climate science shows is that the climate actually responds faster to reductions in CO2 than our older models predicted. That means that debacarbonization can have real and meaningful positive impacts beyond what we previously thought possible.

There is real damage already done, and there is damage that we cannot undo, but there is never a point where the problem goes beyond our input. The climate fight is always worth fighting.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Fuck that. It's never lost, it's just that we are constantly heading towards worse outcomes.

If we as humanity start taking it seriously tomorrow, it would still be a victory over only starting in a decade.

It's not lost, it's just getting worse, and that should make people want to fight.

saying that the fight is lost is just creating more disengagement and hopelessness.

I like the saying "The best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago, the second best is today." Because it is almost universally true about any long term goal.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are using the broadest possible definition of "lost."

Lost as in no more human civilization. It doesn't matter when you start doing stuff, that future is coming. We could maybe slow it at this point, but not much else and even that is up for debate with all the tipping points being reached. They will have a far greater effect on the climate than anything that we do now.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Human civilization is bound to die at some point. If we give up now it will just happen faster and with more suffering. If we fight we will still improve things, maybe not everything will be okay, but when has it ever been?

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's also the biosphere to think about. Even in we go, it doesn't mean that all life has to go with us

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We kill 80 billion land animals per year for factory farming and we’ve caused almost 2 species of animal per year, every year, to go completely extinct over the last 500 years.

We are going to destroy almost all life on this planet.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even if we intentionally released as much co2 as we could all life on earth is not at risk. Remember that there's a fair amount of life that is virtually unchanged since the paleozoic period when all that co2 was in the air. Beyond that there's stuff that hangs out in volcanic vents, rapidly evolving life that can adapt even to rapid change, bacteria, molds, mosses and algae. And who knows maybe there's even a small adaptable mammal or 2 that gets out and evolves enough for a second attempt at sapience.

Don't get me wrong the climate disaster is truly a unique and devastating extinction event, but humans are not so powerful as to leave the earth a completely lifeless rock.

load more comments (1 replies)

Exactly. Fuck the humans, at this point I just want as much as else possible to be saved.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I suppose it wasn't clear in my comment but I'm not advocating for doing nothing. Just to have realistic expectations about what is possible. If you sell everyone on reversing everything, and then fail, it will breed discontent further than being honest. That's all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Canada (and the world) will burn. You think migrants are a problem now? Wait until millions of people have no choice but to go north and the water wars start.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Futurama, Crimes of the hot episode was a prophecy

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just hope that the next intelligent species will speedrun capitalism

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

With the Sun it's hard to really believe there's enough time left in the habitable zone Earth era left.

*for that to happen again.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

Nah, for it's left how much? 4-5 billion years, mass extinctions happen like every 100 million years and after each one there's nonzero probability of intelligent life occurring.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the focus on politics, economics, and law are all destined to fail because they are based around humans. They’re designed to guide humans, but we’ve left out the foundation of our existence, which is nature, clean air, pure water, rich soil, food, and sunlight. That’s the foundation of the way we live and, when we construct legal, economic and political systems, they have to be built around protecting those very things, but they’re not.

Powerful truth!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NeedMoreLimes@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think he's right, but he's also a real asshole and lives in a mansion in Vancouver and likely creates more environmental damage than the average human

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] demerara@social.vivaldi.net 36 points 3 days ago

@asg101 I agree we've lost the opportunity and will have to "hunker down". But hearing it from David Suzuki is...hard.

load more comments
view more: next ›