this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
1095 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

51834 readers
1612 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 106 points 1 week ago (13 children)

How do people still argue that landlords are useful and necessary?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By being landlords or personally knowing landlords.

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 31 points 1 week ago (17 children)

I swear my uncle is a good landlord. Keeps prices low, I swear he doesn't rip off his renters. He would never do that.

If there were as many good landlords as I have heard this story we wouldn't have any problems Kyle, sit the fuck back down.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 week ago (51 children)

Assuming this comment isn't ironic: there is no such thing as a good landlord. Landlords are parasitic middlemen who live by leeching off the value created by workers. They contribute no value whatsoever.

This is admitted even in mainstream economics, its termed rent-seeking.

load more comments (51 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My parents own multiple rental properties and completely straight face told me it's a charity cause they rent to people who can't afford homes.

Meanwhile I'm engaging with my mutual aid group every week handing out about 400 meals, and survival gear for people who can't afford anything.

Glad their fucking charity has turned enough profit to pay off the rentals, their main home, and their vacation spot though. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

The people saying that are usually hoping to become landlords themselves.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I just found an article (from 1955) by my grandma where she argued that she prefers renting over building a house because she has more freedom that way. She can move more easily because she doesn't have to find a buyer for her house, she doesn't have to worry about something breaking because that's on the landlord to fix and she doesn't have to go into debt to live somewhere.

As far as I know she never owned a home, always rented. But all her kids bought houses.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, but it sounds like she’s never been evicted for no reason.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

And her rent probably didn't take 100 hours of labor a month.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I had a coworker liked that. He enjoyed renting because it meant having fewer responsibilities.

I disagreed, and countered that renting means being more dependent on somebody else. Some landlords are excellent at responding to repair calls, but there are so many more that will leave you hanging for an indetermined amount of time, while leaks continue or appliances break. Personally, I'd rather not have the quality of life in my own home be dependent on someone who doesn't really care about me.

Sadly, I don't have much of a choice. I would prefer being able to pick my own repair people or just fix simple things myself. Alas, like so many others, I work full time but remain stuck in the rent trap. So much for freedom.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They kinda are necessary, given how they're the byproduct of capitalism's private property model and its commodification.

You could technically remove them by having the state manage all the housing, but that's overly idealistic given how that'd go against the ruling class interests which would cause heavy lobbying by big landowners. It would also make the state a monopoly landowner which would have its own implications.

In other words, they're necessary not because they're useful, but because of how dogshit the system is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Please use gender neutral inclusive language, instead of landlord, use the gender neutral term, landleech.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I was ready to hate on this post... but you right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And then they raise rent. For what? They haven't upgraded anything. They haven't added any of that value to the property. Every year the house gets older. Cars lose value every year even if you maintain it perfectly.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 week ago

And then they try to fuck you over when you leave the place by pinning all the costs of normal dilapidation on you. Fortunately where I live the law forbids it but it doesn't stop them from trying every time.

[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The land is what’s gaining value, not the structure on it

load more comments (11 replies)

Good tenants make the neighborhood more desirable. So the rent being raised is a way to punish good Tennant, and steal their hard earn benefit from their existential labour.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

If there were only a set number of cars available and creating more was prohibitively expensive, cars would appreciate in value as well.

And to be clear, I'm not talking about the house; building more of those is expensive, but doable. It's building more land that's the tricky part

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Landlord said to me "property tax has gone up. This is my only form of income. Will need to increase rent"

Told him "yeah, everything has gone up and my paycheck is still the same".

Like, these types of relationships are so parasitic. This is the "nice" mom and pop style landlord too that every liberal seems to want to give a pass too.

Sure, are they less bad than the big corporate faceless landlords? Yes. But the entire relationship is the problem.

They get to justify forcing me out of my home because the value of the house that they own WENT UP.

That's why their property tax is more. They literally own something that is more valuable and making it further impossible for me to ever buy a place of my own.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You know what's the fastest way to make landlords disappear? Ask about some broken shit around the house that they are required by law to fix. Radio silence for months guaranteed. Until the next rent increase of course.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For a lot of them, they don't even care if there's tenant turnover, especially if its a high-demand area. There's no incentive to fix a broken AC; the tenants already signed the year lease. They can get to it next year when its time to clean up the place for the re-listing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We don't have an instance stance on landlord apologia, but maybe we should make one, based on the number of people from other instances defending these mooching rent-seeking parasites.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

i hope you do; seeing it is a depressing reminder of how much americans think that exploitation like this is okay and even more depressing to see people exploited like this want to perpetuate it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If i had Jeff Bozos money, I'd buy a bunch of houses and offer them to the homeless to get the back into society. Fucking bozo Bozos is. And that's why I'll never have Jeff Bozos money.

[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"understood, create a factory town and offer housing in exchange for employment." ~ Bezos

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 16 points 1 week ago

Hey, those buildings and apartments aren’t gonna rent themselves! /s

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Rent is due in 5 days.

[–] Grian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Once again, may I introduce you to GEORGISM.

Please, I know lemmy is a bit left leaning, and georgism are mostly libertarians/liberal, but the ideology is so centrist and common sense I'm sure even far left communist advocates can get behind it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

The reason Georgism fell out of favor on the left is because Marxism already develops beyond where Georgism falls flat. It's certainly broadly appealing, in that liberals can get behind it rather quickly, but it falls short of Marxist economics in completeness, to the point that it doesn't really bother resolving the fundamental problems with capitalist exploitation, centralization, crisis, or production and overproduction, it just focuses on rent.

It's also very difficult to get through, it's a reformist approach that depends on asking those that have full control of the economy to make it less exploitative. That doesn't happen without revolution, at which point you can go far beyond and address core, systemic issues.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Leftists are aware of Goergism. They don't generally take it seriously because it's just 'one weird trick' reformism that's trying to save capitalism from itself. It doesn't change what capitalism is or the historical process it drives, it'll get clawed back immediately just like every other social democratic reform, and it would cause a full on capital revolt if you somehow magic lamp'ed it into practice such that you might as well just do the real revolution and actually overthrow capitalism for the same amount of effort.

but the ideology is so centrist and common sense

I really just commented as an excuse to lol at this line.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›