this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

13547 readers
795 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Motor vehicle deaths overall are up, but not nearly to the same degree. From 2009 to 2023, non-pedestrian motor vehicle deaths in the US increased by around 13%, compared to a 78% increase in pedestrian deaths. (The low point in non-pedestrian motor vehicle deaths is actually 2014; deaths are up 20% since then.)

There are a variety of theories for what’s causing this increase in pedestrian deaths. Perhaps the most common theory is that as trucks and SUVs have become both more popular and larger (in height and overall size), pedestrian collisions have become more frequent and more deadly. Another theory (one that’s harder to square with the “US only” nature of the phenomenon) is that drivers are increasingly distracted by smartphones, leading to more accidents. And of course, it could be something else entirely, such as drivers becoming more reckless for some reason.

Looking at the data, the strongest evidence seems to be for the “big SUV” hypothesis: the fatality rate for pedestrian accidents has increased dramatically across a variety of states, pointing to “pedestrian accidents becoming more deadly” as a major cause of the increase. But the case for it isn’t open and shut, as pedestrian deaths involving sedans and compacts have also increased.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

shitty urban design is a bigger reason than people think

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hey now don't forget horribly designed vehicles that are really popular now.

I see those lifted brodozers everywhere and one literally killed a pedestrian weeks ago in a nesrby city where one of my friends lives.

If the hood is too tall to see an adult let alone a child, that thing is just gonna drag people under it's tires.

The low to the ground hood design we had in sedans and coupes was literally a safety feature that allowed a pedestrian who was hit to roll over the top of the vehicle.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

US drivers are notoriously bad drivers.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I mean hey, it's in our constitution: the three unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happinessbrought to you by Shell, Jeep, and the open stroad, respectively.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What people in the US are bad at is examining systems because we're conditioned to believe everything is the sum of individual choice and ability.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

In my Florida city it's high for several reasons:

Bad underfunded public transportation means everybody and their grandmas are driving whether they should be or not. With sprawl it's difficult to keep a job without a car.

Cars don't always stop even when pedestrians have the legal right to cross, they have a might makes right mentality or just aren't used to looking for humans in the crosswalk at the intersection.

I will say that every person here knows someone killed by a car, the rate may look kinda low on a population level but it reaches across all of us, so I don't understand how it doesn't get addressed. The city government here does try, but is constrained by the county and state, and even the lighted crosswalks are often violated, they need gates like a railroad crossing, and more pedestrian bridges. There are a few places we can walk under a bridge here, they are old, and very cool, but no place to cross the river that isn't a car road, not many places to cross the car road except on the surface of the road.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone else feel that site reads like AI? Registered 2023, all posts have the same format. New random articles every 3-4 days complete with research & graphs. Occasionally off topic.

I've been wrong before though. It's hard for me to identify AI content sometimes.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

You'd have to be Artificially-Stupid to think that graph had sufficient distinction between the traces. FML. What a way to waste those data.