this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
586 points (99.8% liked)

News

32759 readers
3292 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 23 points 20 hours ago

~~Federal immigration officer~~

State sponsored terrorist paramilitary.

FTFY

[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So if you defend yourself from these savages.. how would a jury hold that up in court WITHOUT A REASONABLE DOUBT?!?!

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Jury nullification would be in the rise if this ever actually ended up in court.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

or a grand jury. but something tells me the proposed action would never see charges, just vengeance.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironically that makes them easier to identify.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Easier to identify that they're ICE but still impossible to make a complaint or hold anyone accountable.

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 2 points 18 hours ago

Hopefully easier to shoot.

[–] Lag@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully also harder for them to complain back.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

They don't need to complain? They just put you in the van and disappear you.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This would be interesting in the stand your ground and open carry states. Unmarked car pulls into a driveway, unidentifiable armed masked goons jump out and they run straight into a hornets nest.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Interesting" is one way to put it. In reality anyone who practices and abides by these established doctrines to protect their freedoms will be tried for treason because they dared stand up to the undercover gestapo.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why they only harass blue states. ICE wouldn't dare pull this shit in Texas. So many of them would get shot simply for stepping on someone's property.

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 4 points 18 hours ago

God please let this happen, it would be so funny.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah it's a fascist country, and that's not a figure of speech. What could happen, they are backed by the army, thw FBI, the president, the supreme court. Seriously american leftist friends, run while you can, it will get worse, they will come after you.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They can come and get it. This is our county too. I ain't going anywhere.

[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Run with what skills and money?

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

There's going to be a point where the sole goal of escape is more important than what skills and money an individual has. If you can empathize with that then congratulations I believe that is the refugee experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you see a van or SUV without plates please call the cops on them.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The driver answers

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Are cops allowed to protect their citizens from these guys?

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean today ICE even tear gassed a bunch of Chicago cops who were trying to clear a path out for them. The ICE thugs are cowards and will turn on local police in a heartbeat. (See also capitol police beaten on Jan 6.)

Sauce? Wanna see this

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 1 points 18 hours ago

Yes, but they are obliged to. Police has no duty to protect or serve anyone, as per law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 143 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Theoretically, what would happen if an armed US citizen was confused or scared and thought he was being kidnapped. The perpetrators refused to identify, and he shot and killed them. They weren't dressed properly and were trying to put him in an unmarked, unlicensed vehicle.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago (4 children)

honest answer: they will be shot and killed in return. in the rare case they are not killed they will be given the most lacking “proper trial” possible. even in castle doctrine states with no obligation to retreat, things like the 2nd amendment are only really (in effect) applicable on a civilian to civilian case. The state will always “extra judicially” take care to shock and awe in retaliation. cf: philly move bombing, waco, and the recent bombing of “drug runner boats” in international waters.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is the answer, and I don't think confusion would play any part here.

If the kidnapping victim in this scenario somehow survives, they'll surely be held in custody pending trial. When it comes to legal firearm use, they would need to make the case that A) they reasonably felt in imminent danger for their lives, and B) that they acted to eliminate the threat. Even in an ideal world where a jury acquits them, they still get to live with "I killed someone".

If you're carrying, you have to have already been doing everything right before any incident where you are forced to eliminate a threat to your person. If you did anything provocative, you're fucked. After the threat is eliminated, you need to stop shooting, because if you take any harmful action after threats have been eliminated, you're fucked.

But the fact is that if you're in that situation, where you have to draw and fire, there's going to be multiple people (threats) on you. The odds that you are able to eliminate all of those threats before being killed yourself are low.

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Self defense applies to other selves, as well. Not just your unique self. It extends to other people. Meaning YOU don't have to be the one in danger.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Yes this is true. It also adds an extra layer of “are you making the right decision”, so take extra care.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Depends on the laws of the specific state.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago

or they try to carjack you, and use your car to run them over, or defend yourself.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be clear self-defense, but they would be jailed for life in El Salvador or some shit nonetheless because rule of law is crumbling in this country

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Oh, no. They would be shot.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

The muppets in the Federal government are trying their hardest to make this occur so they can try and find some loophole to go ahead with their martial law plans to arrest all the people they don't like that week. What we're likely seeing is mature restraint on behalf of firearm owners.

Some years back, the quote was something like, "as soon as you discharge your weapon, you are looking at spending at least $10,000 from legal fees" (if you don't have firearm insurance and/or if it would even be applicable) - that number is probably tenfold now. Not to mention the very likely personal harm others have mentioned.

Legal fees or not, being dead is pretty hard to come back from.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

It's bound to happen eventually, so we'll find out

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 day ago (9 children)

This article talked about how what ICE was doing was illegal, but didn't ask anyone on the police force if they'd enforce the law against them.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you see a vehicle with no license plates & it’s doing anything even remotely unusual (speeding, driving erratically, etc) then call 911 and report it. If it’s driving erratically then tell 911 that you’re concerned the driver could be drunk etc. given the behavior you’re witnessing.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (6 children)

"Driving without license plates" is unusual.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Sporting the kidnapper look even more on point. Ask them the secret word or run

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That still leaves the VIN at the drivers side dashboard

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

But what does that get us? This is secret police in 2025. Masked, unmarked, unidentifiable and kidnapping people to unknown and untraceable locations. Often just straight out of the country. How is this not a bigger deal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›