this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
244 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

4350 readers
874 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 115 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Who wants this? What the fuck?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shareholders and marketers want this.

It has become increasingly important for DirecTV to diversify revenue beyond satellite and Internet subscriptions. DirecTV had over 20 million subscribers in 2015; in 2024, streaming business publication Next TV, citing an anonymous source “close to the company,” reported that the AT&T-owned firm was down to about 11 million subscribers.

Simultaneously, the streaming industry—including streaming services and streaming software—has been increasingly relying on advertising to boost revenue. For some streaming service providers, increasing revenue through ads is starting to eclipse the pressure to do so through subscriber counts. Considering DirecTV's declining viewership and growing interest in streaming, finding more ways to sell ads seems like a natural progression.

With legacy pay TV providers already dealing with dwindling subscriptions, introducing new types of ads risks making DirecTV less appealing as well.

And it’s likely that things won’t end there.

“This, we can integrate across different places within the television,” [advertisement provider] Glance COO Mansi Jain told The Verge. "We are starting with the screensaver, but tomorrow… we can integrate it in the launcher of the TV."

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

More people are moving to streaming services! Quick, let's make shit way worse!

[–] Little_Urban_Achiever@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

More people are leaving our streaming service! Quick let's make it worse for the people who stayed!

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Where the fuck are they gonna go? Back to cable? Mwahahahaha

Twirls Dick Dastardly mustache

[–] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Twirls Dick Dastardly, mustache

FTFY

[–] emerald@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Twirls dick, dastardly mustache

FTFY

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think we are seeing "late abandoner" costs with large groups of people. It's like paying high "early adopter" costs but instead of getting new technology for it, you get the comfort of hanging on to old stuff as its business model circles the drain and the executives piloting the sinking ships bleed the dwindling customer base for whatever they can.

I think you're exactly right. It's the new generation of 'last in, first out'.

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 58 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I feel a class action lawsuit incoming: "Advertisers using customers likeness in ads, without providing compensation"

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ever notice how now a days you have to scroll through the whole TOS before blindly clicking AGREE?

Yea...

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TOS means nothing in court.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Here's hoping American courts keep meaning anything.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

True. Knock on wood.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago (3 children)

In case you were wondering how they would get a picture of the users face…

“DirecTV's screensavers will let a user create an AI avatar of themself by scanning a QR code on the screensaver”

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 26 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The only good that can come from this is butt faces.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Maybe that will be the data which finally breaks the image generators back.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Cat anus faces

[–] londos@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Or Bill Morrow, the CEO.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for this. I was imagining some dystopian requirement that you had to let them scan your face or pay an extra $10 a month or something.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago

Give them a month

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ok. But why would anyone actually do that?

"Ooh I wish I was in that dishwasher ad"

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

No. No, I don't think it will.

[–] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 days ago

You can fuck right off.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

I don't get how this would ever be a good idea.

I would be extremely uncomfortable seeing my face in adverts, even for products I use. I'm already uncomfortable with adverts using personal recommendations based on tracking my web history & habits.

I actively avoid those products in the future, and I can only see this alienating their marketing base further.

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

I'd be more angry about this, but I just found out that DirecTV is still in business.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Oh, you mean the real reason there has been a push to get us to use face ID verification on every site that depends on ads?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 15 points 5 days ago

Avoid DirecTV like the plague? I'm on it...

[–] hotdogcharmer@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 days ago

Marketers ruin everything. Marketers are liars. I've worked with marketing departments in every job I've ever had, and they're scum every time. Social media obsessed weirdos who can't do anything honest and authentic. Freaks.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Bwahahahaha! I don't even watch TV any more. Every time I wind up at my parent's home I cannot believe the idiocy that's on the TV. Ball game is on? They've made sure it's impossible that a single frame of the feed does not show at least one advertisement, whether "splashed" over the video or covering every square inch of the location they're broadcasting.

"Television" is officially dead to me, but I get that a lot of people still watch it. What I don't understand is WHY they do.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What better reason not to get DirecTV

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Im surprised it still exists

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

I honestly didn’t know it still did.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 16 points 5 days ago

DirecTV's screensavers will let a user create an AI avatar of themself by scanning a QR code on the screensaver. Afterward, they can use the avatar to browse through different AI content. Users will also reportedly be able to dress up their AI avatars, allowing Glance's screensaver to recommend real-life products to purchase by performing a reverse-image search.

Who is gonna even willingly do this? You're not creating a Mii to put into Wii Sports. It's just to advertise to you.

(the company Glance, mentioned in the quote, is the company providing the AI screensaver ad technology to DirecTV)

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Could I just use my cat's face?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

I'd cut the plug off the dongle doodad and then run it over if this happened to me.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

People with DirecTV will enjoy looking at my face, I guess?

[–] J92@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I was scrolling through my LG TV's settings not long ago and the amount of times it vampirically suggested I invite it onto my WiFi made me laugh.

No my friend, you're my dumb TV. My laptop already doesn't allow ads, so why would I need you to for a less navigable UI?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Your face, maybe. My face, no.