this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
408 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26076 readers
2629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alaska's City of Fairbanks Mayor David Pruhs, a Republican, conceded to Mindy O'Neall, a Democrat, in the mayoral election on Tuesday night.

According to unofficial election night results made available by the city of Fairbanks, O’Neall received 1,808 votes (54 percent) and Pruhs received 1,528 votes (45.7 percent).

The ballot in mayoral elections in Fairbanks does not list party affiliations next to candidates’ names, but Republicans have held the role in Fairbanks for nearly a decade.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 92 points 4 days ago (4 children)

MOAR!

You dumbfucks let trump happen, again. Now fix your stupid American problems - sincerely the civilized world.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 75 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The civilized world better beware that America is not just ahead of the scary times. Some of the right-wing movements in Europe, in particular are downright frightening, and close to winning elections.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because centrists like Macron and Jeffries keep trying to shove unpopular market-centric bullshit on to people. Human beings in general haven't gotten worse, our leadership class has.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 days ago

we're big tent parties! But only the right side matters

[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh! This is just the beginning... Just watch the first Tuesday in November, when a lot of special elections happen. ;)

But, the real stuff won't happen until November, 2026 -- which will be the mid-terms where a bunch of our Senate and Congressional seats will be up for elections...

[–] CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Litmus test is the Virginia election. All of their statewide positions occur during the odd years. And this year, the governor is up for grabs.

[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that will be a big one to watch in just a few weeks.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just wait. The dumbfucks will sit it out again. smugly confident because of some polls say, or because their bellybutton lint changed color again and it's too much for their virtue signalling personalities to handle, or something. Lazy disconnected people will just make up any excuse and point fingers away from them every time.

[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 1 points 3 days ago

I won't say there isn't room for concern, especially as there are quite a few people that are starting to think that the issues between the parties are irreconcilable. And the problem is, one party seems more disingenuous than the other -- at least that's my perspective.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All of the problems really are stupid, aren't they?

I saw a video yesterday of a dude in the passenger seat of a car lighting up some fireworks which then exploded in the car.

Nobody made him do it. As it happened he clearly had no idea what to do. Everything was going fine until he decided to light the fireworks.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If you don't understand WHY those fireworks had to be lit right then and there then clearly you don't understand Freedom.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Please for the love of God convince your reps to send their militaries and help us before this shit gets too locked down.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That turnout is depressing.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems on par with local council elections in the UK.

My town is about the same size as this "city" and the turnout is pretty similar.

People are pretty disconnected with politics in general. The national elections only get half-decent turnout because they spend tens of millions on ad campaigns before it.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Local politics. Eh I usually don't bother.

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

32000 people in the city, so that's like.... 10%?

Crazy low

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

Turnout was 15% per a local journalist's blog. That's lower than the 15-20% it normally is, but not crazy low.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

It's not that depressing.

Local election turnout is single digit to ~15% in big cities. It's higher in rural areas, but still well below state and federal races.

15-20% is normal for a local election in Fairbanks, from what I read. So this would be higher than most population centers but low end of normal for this electorate.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 28 points 4 days ago

Fairbanks had a democratic mayor from 2013-16, which was very surprising to me. And to my mother who grew up there in the 60s.

https://thealaskacurrent.com/2025/10/09/fairbanks-progressives-win-near-sweep-in-local-elections/

This blog, which I think may be using "progressive" wrongly, says that Ds won all other contested spots but 1 school board seat. An uncontested race went to R, but a "late forming" write in campaign still garnered a quarter of the vote.

These signs seem promising, but the blog post makes it seem like local factors may have played a large role. That would speak against taking it as a bellwether. The post claims the victory is "less of a shock" to those watching local politics, which again to me suggests local factors looming large.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

A mayoral race in a town with 31k people, clearly the start of the blue wave… 🙄

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a really low turnout for a city of around 30,000 people. Like under 20% low, assuming 20,000 adults of voting age.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Don't you have to dig yourself out of a snow bank to go anywhere?

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Not at this time of year

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Have Republicans won anything recently?

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 29 points 4 days ago

Gerrymandering districts!

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 17 points 4 days ago

Supreme Court cases.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How recently? I mean, they won control of all 3 branches of our government.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I mean, have they won any special elections since they took over the government? It seems like a lot of elections are flipping but maybe that's selection bias.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Installing fascism in the United States..?