Hypothetically, one could step away from the whole internet/media/information system. Stick with firsthand experience and the testimony of trusted friends.
To what degree would that include "science"?
What would that look like. Amish?
Plesiohedron
joined 1 week ago
"informed"
Lol
But I kid. Your logic fails to escape the box I propose, I think. I think that only direct observation achieves good reliability. That and maybe conversation with personal friends.
Beyond that, big nope. It's the epistemological equivalent of drinking out of lead cups except the damage is quicker.
Everybody say it all together now..
I'm an intelligent, autonomous, free-thinking individual!
Carpenter coder here. I like saving my code powers for my own beloved projects.
My thoughts as well.
It makes me wonder about my own fears. How many of them were put there by propaganda?
Instead of demanding that the peers get vaccinated they could just stay away from the peers.
It was a wrong turn anyway, so I edited it. Sorry. I hoped to catch it before you replied.
But my point was the arrogance and disrespect. I find it shocking. The actual form of the insult was secondary.
That was the original idea for alien. The aliens are actually this advanced cultured race. But they get crazy in childhood and puberty.
Society is insane. Gotta deal with that somehow.
I'm a rural carpenter. I fly under all radar.
Me to. Dr Who. I had the dumbest british accent through my teens.
We could order understanding by quality.
First there is perception. That's the closest. Then there is thought about that. Then there is the secondhand form of that, gotten from a friend. Then gotten from a mere associate. Then a stranger. Thirdhand and fourthhand. And so on.
Close to far. That close kind you don't even have to think or talk about it.
Perceptions like rightness, beauty, gut make a good guide. Art and invention are proof of that. Call it a good source of truth.
Not too good for building objective consensuses tho.