foxglove

joined 4 days ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 hour ago

The way that pain has historically been managed has long been influenced by racism and sexism, ACOG noted in the guidance. Studies have found that health care professionals sometimes underestimate how much pain a female patient experiences and don’t perceive female pain to be urgent, said Amanda Williams, a pain researcher and professor of clinical health psychology at University College London.

In a 2016 study co-authored by Dr. Williams, 63 pain doctors and medical students were shown images of people in pain and were asked what the appropriate treatment for that pain would be. Participants suggested “more medical referrals for the male images and more psychologist or psychiatrist referrals for females,” Dr. Williams said. The findings underscore a notion that “women can’t distinguish pain from emotion, whereas men can suppress their emotions and give you a pure account of their pain,” she added.

I had to find the extra context, but wow yeah, the old guidelines are based on super sexist notions 😬

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 hour ago

it's a rule of this community, the rules apply to every post and comment

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

thanks for your comment, but this community is a women-only space. Hope you understand 🧡

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 hours ago

thanks for your helpful comment, but this community is for women only - hope you understand! 🧡

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

it's amazing to me how many people rush into having children and getting married (let alone just living together) without basic conversations or logistics being figured out ...

Like, it seems so reasonable to sit down and have a conversation - like you say, hashing out a social contract of living together. It builds consent, avoids resentment, creates fairness, deepens trust and reliability ... it just feels like the bare minimum to make a relationship work, to be honest.

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 4 points 5 hours ago

Well, I have a lot to say about this (someone needs to turn my verbose mode off, ugh).

The phrase "to each according to their need, from each according to their ability" seems to be an implicit organizing principle in my relationship, whoever is best situated to do a task most easily is most likely to do it.

However, this creates some unfairness.

Just because of the way my brain is, I have a harder time planning ahead, being reliable to a schedule, and maintaining an regular level of executive functioning. Especially historically I suffered from what I now realize were fairly bad levels of depression and anxiety, which put too much burden on my partner, who is extremely hard-working, reliable, and capable.

Small example: if I need to call a doctors office for something, it might take me weeks to do it and it was exhausting and difficult for me to do (both initiating the task was difficult, but also handling the anxiety of talking on the phone was overwhelming).

So I basically constantly feel like I'm not doing enough, esp. relative to my extremely industrious and capable spouse.

My depression and anxiety are much better now, so I'm more likely to finish a task like calling someone within a week rather than sitting on it for a week or longer, and I have much less anxiety during the call. I even pro-actively pick up social tasks like making a phone call sometimes to lighten my spouse's plate, which is something I rarely ever did before.

A lot of the time we end up competing to do tasks, e.g. I constantly have to fight my partner to be able to drive if we're going somewhere together (she tries to monopolize that labor).

Because I do all the cooking, my partner is also very aggressive about doing the dishes to compensate, which makes me feel bad, because I think it's not fair (doing dishes is dull labor, cooking is often fun - they're not equal). So I try to sneak a few dishes in, and try to wash as many dishes from my cooking before she can get to them, as a way to pull my weight there (even though she would prefer I don't do any of the dishwashing).

With laundry she always initiates washing clothes, because I wouldn't do laundry more than once a week, but she initiates laundry three to four times a week, so it's harder for me to ever initiate doing the laundry (and even if we were on the same page about doing loads once a week, I tend to struggle to initiate tasks like that anyway, so there would probably be inequality there just because I'm more flaky, essentially).

So to compensate, I try to be proactive and sneak down to swap loads and fold the clothes to help out, but it never really balances out the labor, e.g. the cognitive labor she does keeping track and initiating so many of the tasks isn't made up for by my inconsistent and minor contributions.

It's the same story with cleaning - she initiates cleaning more, and I try to make up for the inequality by doing some of the harder cleaning (like scrubbing the shower or bath, sweeping and mopping the dirty kitchen floors, etc.).

So we try to be egalitarian in our household work, but I don't think it works out perfectly.

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 2 points 6 hours ago

no worries, gender is complicated and the community rules are meant to be maximally inclusive of trans folks, allowing them to decide whether they wish to include themselves in a women's-only community.

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 5 points 21 hours ago

absolutely, there is a whole industry of profiting from sensationalizing crimes (true crime quickly went from blended journalism and fiction to basically reality-TV-ifiying real crimes), and with crimes committed by celebrities that dynamic is heightened

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 2 points 21 hours ago

I feel like he has this uncanny non-Duchenne smile, or maybe just a smile that feels a bit inauthentic or forced, not sure ... there is also a shiftiness to him, either way - I'm picking up the vibe you're talking about, there is an uneasiness with him (honestly maybe he does coke or something and is a bit wired, lol)

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I usually only buy online if the store has a very detailed / accurate size chart for their clothes (some places have generic size charts where the actual clothes sizes don't necessarily match).

Then I measure my body with a tape measure, and for a new place I make a small order usually with two sizes, usually of something I wouldn't mind having both sizes for.

(As others have said, usually I order from places online that have easy return policies, e.g. pact allows me to bring the clothes to any Ulta store nearby and they have a little kiosk that handles the return for me.)

Usually I have to figure out the size for tops and bottoms relative to the place.

But in general I prefer to buy clothes in person and to try them on before deciding.

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 day ago

no worries, and thanks for your understanding 💕

[–] foxglove@lazysoci.al 3 points 1 day ago

thanks for your comment, but this is a womens-only space. Hope you understand! 🧡

 

From a UN Development Programme statement:

In 62 countries, consensual same-sex sexual relations between adults in private are criminalized, with 12 of these countries even imposing the death penalty for such relations.

The 2025 edition of the Rainbow Map has been released:

https://rainbowmap.ilga-europe.org/

Here were some key findings:

  • Conversion practices are only banned in 10 countries.
  • 6 is the number of countries where LGBTI people do not have any protection from discrimination.
  • Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Montenegro, Serbia and Spain are the only countries that have full coverage of SOGIESC in their anti-discrimination legislations.
  • Hate crime and hate speech on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics are prohibited in Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Iceland, Malta, and some regions in Spain and the UK.
  • Marriage equality for same-sex couples is only available in 22 countries.
  • 18 is the number of countries without any legal protection of same-sex partnerships.
  • Trans parenthood is fully recognised only in 8 countries.
  • Only Germany, Greece, Iceland, Malta, Portugal and Spain prohibit unnecessary surgical or medical interventions on intersex children.
  • 11 countries still don’t have any legal or administrative procedure for legal gender recognition.
  • In addition, Bulgaria, Hungary and Russia have laws that make legal gender recognition completely impossible.
  • Only in 12 countries, trans people can have legal gender recognition based on self-determination.
  • Freedom of assembly and association for LGBTI communities are restricted or under attack in at least 14 countries.
  • Sexual orientation and gender identity are qualification criteria for seeking asylum in 27 countries. Intersex asylum seekers are protected in the law only in 6 countries.

EDIT:

wanted to boost this comment by this community's founder and lead moderator:

WomensStuff is 100% committed to LGBT inclusion. We are women only, and trans+ women and non binary are totally welcome here. Homophobia, transphobia, biphobia and gender critical is not. 🏳️‍🌈🌈🏳️‍🌈

view more: next ›