this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
336 points (97.7% liked)

News

27083 readers
4969 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. officials familiar with the planning said options for "reclaiming" the vital waterway include close cooperation with Panama's military and, absent that, possible war.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Can our military just step up already and take these fuckers out? They are duty-bound to refuse unlawful orders.

And these people are fucking traitors.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago

Even if his orders are lawful, they've sworn an oath to defend the constitution from all threats foreign and domestic: they're duty bound to engage him in the exact same way they do with a combatant from Isis or something. Donald Trump is an enemy to the US.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

25th Amendment also applies here. Orange hitler is obviously deranged and dangerous.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Never going to happen. They have given everything to MAGA, if Trump is out of the picture then it's game over. No one cares about Vance, the population would be so enraged he would be impeached and removed faster then you can imagine.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 174 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Illegal wars are a wonderfull distraction from kleptocracy.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 62 points 8 hours ago

Sheesh, if I had $1.1 trillion every time a Republican administration tried that trick...

[–] sporkler@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

technically it's not a war it's a 'спецопера́ция'

[–] Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world 91 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What did we hear from Trumpers last year, that he was the candidate for peace or some such shit?

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They meant a candidate for 'piece.' A piece of this country, a piece of that country.

[–] Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Ah, my mistake lol.

[–] lostlittletimeonthis@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He was angling for the Nobel peace prize in Ukraine but I guess he figured out it was too hard

[–] Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

His buddy Vlad won't allow that!

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 54 points 7 hours ago

I miss when I would wake up and check the news and nothing particularly crazy was going on. Like you would click on the TV and they are talking about a zoo that recently got a baby giraffe or something.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago

then-President Jimmy Carter transferred sovereignty to Panama in the late 1970s.

We're literally just invading another country to take their property. Which to be fair IS a long rich American tradition, but gawdamnit it has to stop.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Will this make eggs cheaper?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, but it will severely disrupt golabl trade and make everything more expensive so you don't think about eggs anymore.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 4 hours ago

… then Profit?

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 27 points 7 hours ago

Fuck Trump. I can’t believe the shit this useless rapist is putting the world through. He needs to eat dirt.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I could totally see this going sideways because they removed quality leadership, engineers, and soldiers via racism.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure the political party that rushed the country into a war over an obvious lie and then told soldiers they'd just have to deal with their Humvees not having any armor for a few months while they were being ordering to patrol around the IED capitol of the world will feel just awful about it for as long as they're on camera

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 46 points 8 hours ago (7 children)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago

My theory:

Panama controls a major trade route and charges shitloads of money for each ship that passes.

Same reason for Canada. The North-West Passage is melting and will be open year round in the not too distant future.

The same makes sense for Greenland if you consider Russia as a trade partner with lots of raw metals. Plus Greenland itself may have oil. Again, this when the ice melts completely.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 46 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

He wants to be a strongman and he realizes peoples' impression of him is nearly as small as his penis.

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

How optimistic of you thinking he has a dick. He’s a clean cut choir boy. Aaaaaameeeeen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago

Papa Putin says so.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago

Putin knows that one of the quickest ways to destroy the US is if the rest of western civilization abandons it. Russia saw firsthand how quickly nearly the entire world joined in to sanction and abandon them when they invaded Ukraine with that bullshit story. The Panama shit is an even worse excuse, almost guaranteed to turn the western world fully against the US.

However, it's also physically separated enough from the US that Americans at home that don't pay attention won't be directly affected to turn against it with retaliation, the Republican base is racist and narcissistic enough to back it seriously, and with a large enough power imbalance so unlike Ukraine there's no chance of a prolonged conflict.

The infrastructure isn't in place yet for them to just do whatever they want and arrest every protester like Russia does, so they do have to still take that into account, Panama is remote and unknown to a large portion of the population sadly. But the building of Panama Canal is something that many learned about in school as a pivotal historical infrastructure project. Something still in use today and referenced in the news even though they may not know where it is. For the America is Best narcissist, taking back what "we" built is an admirable goal.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 31 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

Because you can’t really invade a place full of white people like Greenland or Canada. Even the diehard Trump fans would probably not be okay with that. On the other hand, a country full of poor, brown people that have only ever been fucked over by America? Well shit, we can’t wait to bomb them! George Carlin explained it, America loves bombing brown people. Anyone in the US military with the slightest amount of backbone will not follow these illegal orders. See the Nuremberg Trials if you’re not sure what an illegal order looks like. They aren’t even trying with a WMD hoax, this is just an illegal invasion.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I entirely agree we shouldn't do it, but I don't believe it would necessarily be an illegal order to follow.

Invading a sovereign country for overtly offensive reasons isn't against any particular military law, it's just shitty.

The president doesn't have the power to declare war, only to do everything involved in a war, but I don't think that would actually make any of the orders illegal, unless they were to explicitly do some war crimes or some such.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

I get what you’re saying, though maybe when America becomes the new nazis, we can have a Nuremberg Trial 2.0 and set some new precedents!

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Even the diehard Trump fans would probably not be okay

Given the number of diehard trump fans who wish harm to other members of the US and agitate for an internal war, I doubt this is true for the majority of them.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You may be right. When logic and reason are your enemy, no one will be able to guess your next move (apparently kicking self in nuts repeatedly).

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Join us tomorrow for the next exciting episode of, "Ow, My Balls!!!"

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Give Fox News 6 months of their two minutes hate bullshit and Trumpers will be frothing at the mouth for Canadian blood. Americans have already proven that we'll follow a blatant liar into war if the propaganda sets the tone for it.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Maybe, but relationships between the American and Canadian military are way too entrenched, even if it was a direct order, it’s pretty hard to suddenly point your weapons at someone who’s been a dedicated ally. Though I won’t blame Canadians for being more than a little pissed for quite some time, I just don’t see how this would actually happen.

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

And then in 10 years everyone gets to pretend that they were 'against it the whole time' like they did with the Iraq War.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

The lake that feeds it is not recharging fast enough so they’re limiting passage of ships and making them take longer and more dangerous routes. So he’s probably planning to commit ecocide on the lake for the handful of years it can sustain the canal at max capacity but long enough to stymie other routes being planned or built.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Penile dysmorphic disorder

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. Really? Like really really?

We're now gonna massacre a bunch of Panamanians for a shipping canal? Fuck.

Well, now that they clearly have great OPSEC, I hope Panama sabotages the hell out of it.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think Panama did say they'd destroy the canal before they'd allow it to be taken. I took a cursory look for that tidbit, but the news feeds about the canal are blown up at the moment.

[–] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

If I had to wager a guess, destroying the canal wouldn't stop a takeover. Rebuilding it would be a fraction of the price of the war.

And don't try telling me that the cost of the war will be much higher than just the military occupation because of shipping costs going up from the canal being shut down, the cost of actually maintaining the place, riots, etc because the idiots who want this wouldn't listen for long enough to think about that anyway.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 minutes ago

The cost of rebuilding would be more than just the cost for materials and labor. They'd also have to deal with a generation of vengeful Panamanian guerillas killing the construction workers, sabotaging equipment, and sinking ships.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And the cost of the war would be a fraction of the money lost during the length of rebuilding. Remember that ship that blocked the Suez? Less than a week and cost nearly $10 billion. It would likely take years, plural, to get Panama functional again.

[–] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

No clue what either would cost, but that's part of why I threw my so disclaimer in

[–] Tja@programming.dev 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

-How full of explosives should we make the canal?

-Yes.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

What canal? All I see is C4.

(Edit: pack the ends of the canal with giant shrapnel)

[–] corvi@lemm.ee 9 points 7 hours ago

Isn’t the Panama Canal basically running out of water? They should act like they’ve been cowed, sell it to us for a ton of money, and laugh all the way to the bank.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

The Orange Turd is planning on taking a shit on Panama.

load more comments
view more: next ›