this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
473 points (98.6% liked)

News

30525 readers
3051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

There's really no excuse for this

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 3 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

Ackman is also a part owner of X, and that platform will also definitely be a big part of an effort to defeat Mamdani.

Edit: a family member just asked me what I think of Mamdani wanting to put a tax on all hiring, saying he proposed a 35% tax on the salary of all new hires. I googled this, and the only results are on X. The fix is in.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 24 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy

Is that a promise? Look dude I'm already sold on him, you don't need to keep selling him

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That is what they always claim, don't they? You can't tax the rich, they'll leave!!

Cool.

Where?

Where will they leave to? Europe? Good luck, taxes are way higher there (not enough , though) either way, you'll be gone from what made you rich in the first place. You're not going anywhere

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Florida. We have no income tax, an increasing population of millionaires, mosquitos, alligators and homeless people.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Ohh! What's not to like? 😵‍💫

Billionaires trying to buy elections

What a crook.

Literally buying elected officials.

A true enemy of the people

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago) (1 children)

I have no clue what Mamdani ideas for NYC are, but if this pile of crap is against him, that signals to me that Mamdani has principles. Bill Ackerman will only support candidates that he can corrupt.

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Free daycare, free public transit, and city-owned grocery stores. Sounds like a dream to me.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

And it's all because he's ~~a dirty democrat~~ ~~a dirty muslim~~ ~a dirty ~socialist~~ will let poor people be less poor and rich people be a little less rich

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Honestly, I'm really liking how this race is shaping up. Adams is refusing to drop out because, well, he can't; the second he loses power he stops being useful to the Trump administration, and then he's vulnerable to prosecution. Cuomo is also staying in because he's a narcissist, and Ackman is willing to throw money at anyone else who wants to run.

So that means the centrist shit-libs and conservative ghouls are splitting their vote between at least two, probably three candidates, while the progressive vote will go entirely to Mamdani. I'm still wary of DNC fuckery, but so far, so good.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

So hes a Trump supporter but doesn't like Sliwa so he's just going to fund an independent? Lmao.

Its good that he's not just funding Sliwa, looks like a rift is forming in the red party.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

Question is whether he dislikes Silwa or just recognizes he can't just spend Silwa into sufficient popularity.

However if he funds a "plausible Democrat", he might split the left vote.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fucking seriously.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Those rich people aren't going anywhere. Theres not another New York City. They're not gonna pack up their factories and offices with datacenters and move them elsewhere.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Standard Republican.

[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 19 points 11 hours ago

Anyone who the billionaire hedge fund manager is planning to bankroll is the guy you probably should be voting against.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 32 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

So let me get this straight. Current tax law favors billionaires. He’s concerned that progressive policies will target taxing billionaires forcing a mass exodus of billionaires thereby undercutting the tax base. In other words they’re already not paying taxes but taxing them more will make them leave. Make it make sense.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 21 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 45 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So they are ok with spending hundreds of millions of dollars, just not in any way that actually improves the city for the people that live in it?

It’s not about the money, it’s just misanthropy.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. The ‘public services’ he wants to save is bribery to avoid paying his fair share. This guy is offering a ‘powerful people’ club membership so he can avoid giving back to a society that enabled his mindblowing fortune. Our system has gotten so used to it he’s totally good with saying it all out loud as if he’s some sort of victim.

Society’s cancer.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

A leech trying to explain why it's good it's sucking your blood.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

"It's not to make sure that I have a lot; it's to make sure that I have a lot more than everyone else. Forever."

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 12 hours ago

you're doing something right when luigi, zohran got billionaires panties in a wad.

[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 62 points 20 hours ago
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 49 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

We need to fix democracy in this country. We can't keep allowing the poor and brown-skin people to vote in favor to their best interest. At least the GOP, MAGA and Billionaires are swiftly working in a solution for this problem.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 278 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean, this guy must live in an insane bubble if he doesn’t understand that this will help Mamdami more than if he had endorsed them. I am sure NYC voters will just rally around a guy who, through funding, owns its allegiance to billionaires.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 43 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Somebody more left-wing than Mamdani has the chance to do something hilarious

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 59 minutes ago

You joke but he might like that just fine. Two progressive candidates splitting the progressive vote could hand an easier victory to a right winger.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 155 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign.

Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 186 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Luigi saved lives and billionaires cried.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 44 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

What's super ironic to me is that taxing them actually makes them safer because if they pay their fair share people wouldn't want to murder them as much as they do now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›