this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
879 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

8779 readers
3228 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

poor kirsten :(, Only 2.5K away from a million. she must be so devo /s

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah the kind that makes you publicly racist.

seriously i hope literally every single one of her constituents is calling her daily to resign. unbelievable how she was straight up KKK posting on that radio interview.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yup. I was jk. I know she's a piece of shit.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the real question is what's Latimer doing for so much more money than the rest... he must be literally sucking bibi's cock twice a day or something.

edit: holy shit apparently they dropped 15 mil at once into the race last year against so he could win against progressive Jamaal Bowman.

https://www.axios.com/2024/06/26/democrats-aipac-jamaal-bowman-george-latimer

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

New York resident here. Hakeem Jeffries has always sucked. As does Kathy Hochul. Complete garbage.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

With the current political climate USA is in, it might weaken him to get endorsements from the establishment.

Their masks are coming off. Voting in line with republicans and being vocal against anything progressive.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I was thinking the other day after NPR mentioned Elon's recent spat that he could fund other candidates in mid terms. If he endorsed Democrats that might do more harm than good lol.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

For sure. I would immediately be sceptical of any candidate, even progressives, if Elon endorsed them.

We'd end up with another Fetterman.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Not projection, just a flat out lie.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 138 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Huge correlation with AIPAC being their top donors, fyi.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 28 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Find me a politician on the US national stage who isn't funded by AIPAC.

Massie doesn't count.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, Rashida Tlaib, Summer Lee, AOC (though she's compromised with the party leadership on Israel's genocide to an abhorrent degree nonetheless), Ayanna Presley, Cory Bush (successfully primaried over it) and Jamaal Bowman (ditto), and everyone else not listed here.

They're a small minority for sure, but they exist and pretending otherwise just feeds into the manipulative establishment "electability" narrative that they use to poison the public against progressive candidates.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 days ago

I find it incredibly ironic and enlightening that the one Jewish congressperson I can name off the top of my head is on this list.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] deddit@lemmy.world 69 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Okay, just hear me out for a second.... I completely agree they should endorse him, but rather than just saying they are irreverent (though this may actually be the case) I would like to know in clear and concise terms WHY they are waiting/failing to endorse the man whom was chosen by the people. I think knowing why they won't endorse him is very relevant to the discussion. Eith

TLDR; their silence is very telling.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Honestly, I don't want their endorsement. Fuck em. This party is getting taken over by the left or we're burning it down.

I think they see the inevitable rise of fascism and don't want to get grabbed by Trump's brown shirts. They're liberals that are being scratched and looking for a safe place in the future.

They didn't even do their typical. "Oh we're against the bombing of Iran but because he didn't go through Congress". I literally was waiting to roll my eyes at all their liberal "following procedure for our war crimes" but they even stayed quiet about it mostly.

We had two parties. Fascist and Liberals. Now we just have fascist and Liberals looking for a safe place in the new power structures. They're kind of confused I think. A little caught off guard with how much Trump is following through on actual policy. They're use to both parties lying and giving working class dollars to the rich. The conservatives are no longer playing the game of politics they all use to love that got nothing done.

Fuck the party leaders and most of these shits in Washington. They have no place now. We don't need their endorsement.

We can win with the momentum. We don't need to win power back through votes. We just need to give this countries people enough hope to build class consciousness. Decades can happen it weeks.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (19 children)

I don't know about the rest of them, though I certainly have my suspicions, but with gillibrand it's very clearly just racism. That interview she gave was extremely telling.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's rich people. The reason is rich people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

They've given interviews. According to them, Mamdani hasn't yet proven his viability among the general population, he only won a primary where 15% of the DNC participated with a plurality vote of 43%. Furthermore, some of them represent districts that hardlined against Mamdani such as neighborhoods in the southeastern part of Brooklyn. Mamdani won Brooklyn overall but the difference between neighborhoods he won and lost were very stark.

I agree with you, though, that they should endorse Mamdani. Any concerns about his type of socialism can be easily quelled with Mamdani's clear opposition to "communist countries".

Not endorsing Mamdani is just asking to split the vote and give Republicans the chance to fuck everything up.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't like 'viability among gen pop'. It's like assessing his electability. Doesn't matter, he was chosen in a democratic primary vote. He's the democratic candidate for mayor. If they expect us to fall in line and vote blue, they need to fall in line and endorse blue.

Rich fucks

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That kind of reasoning makes sense to not endorse him in a run off.

But in the general election? He's got your party's nomination, so back your party. Your Cuomo boy got primaried, get over it. (Edit: the 'your' in this sentence applies to the party members listed in the OP, not the commenter and/or OP)

This is just money talking. Rich people don't like the ones that look like they won't bend to them. Hopefully he continues to not.

Also, this is yet another reason I don't associate with political parties. Super not a fan of them. It's the system we got, and I do vote with the dual party power structure in mind, but you'll never see me signed up in one.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 80 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Why the fuck is schumer still in office?! Hes the very definition of a dickless, useless democrat. Fuck that guy, just get lost useless boomer, let someone who gives a shit take the seat.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

AOC will probably primary him. Schumer is at something like a 2 decade low in approval while AOC polls much higher state-wide.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (4 children)

He's WORSE than useless. Not only is he a Manchin level shill for fossil fuel interests, he's said that his job is to "keep the left Pro Israel", a statement so blatant that he'd call out anyone ascribing that sentiment to him for using the antisemitic "dual loyalty" trope.

There's literally REPUBLICANS in Congress right now that are less awful than he is! Imagine that: the Senate leader of what the Dem leadership pretends to be the Left being worse than some actual fascists 🤬

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago

money. same as the rest who vote pro-fascist

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you primary these establishment fucks out you don't have this problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Did those politicians say "vote blue no matter who" or was that people online in an effort to avoid gestures broadly?

Genuine question, they've always been massive disappointments who would benefit from that.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (16 children)

I specifically said "vote blue no matter who", because while yes, there are Establishment Democrats that exist, Extermination Republicans are quite objectively fucking worse.

Because if Fascist 47 wasn't in office, we could at least try to get shit done, instead of putting out 17+ daily fires.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Rebrand: Vote Blue, because what else can you do?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Ah, but if you said anything against the blue (but not in favor of red), you were the vile, evil... CENTRIST! (I.e. a label just applied to you to single you out for not blindly agreeing with the zeitgeist.) Seriously, the front page of Lemmy for a good while was just toxic political "VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO" and if you didn't agree, you were just a problem.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The critical part of 'vote blue no matter who' is the voting part. That's the game plan short-term when it's election season.

That does not preclude criticizing the incumbents. Or even the candidates. But no matter how you feel about them, you vote for them to stave off misery, and encourage everyone around you to do the same.

Not voting for them sends a message, but it's the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP. Stop fascism in its tracks and vote blue. Fight for actual progress by doing what you can to forward actual progressive candidates and policies. Like NYC is doing right now.

It boggles my mind how people seem to be incapable of wrapping their head around that concept, and instead continue to insist that we shouldn't be voting for DNC candidates because


uh - it'll make things better??? Somehow??? At this point, the willful ignorance is starting to smack of sealioning.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not voting for them sends a message, but it’s the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP

Hard disagree on that. That's assuming the intentions of the people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

If you're argument is that we need to be doing what's right and pushing for progress, then why is that cast as something ONLY the "blue" can do? I don't know how old you are to see how many times the "blue" has absolutely failed at their job, failed the people, but for no other reason than they're in the right party, they keep getting voted in. But I've seen several "blue" presidents do anywhere from fuckall to the bare minimum in terms of progress/change.

There are other options to vote for that don't just include the GOP as you seem to suggest. The US isn't supposed to be just a 2 party system. It's supposed to be dynamic; these parties are supposed to die off when they no longer represent the people. If you want progress and change, but keep doing the same thing that doesn't seem to be all that progressive.... are you making any progress?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 4 days ago

Add them to the list.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It's always been the same fear mongering strategy dems and Repubs have always used. Today it's just very effective.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is one of those situations where not certifying the guy and just getting out of the way is an absolutely terrible idea if you enjoy your position. He got young voters out. The same people who are pretty decent at getting out and organizing for protests and with the way things are going these fish may grow teeth. Maybe not sharks, though no one messes with piranhas all the same.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›