this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
974 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8468 readers
2353 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought that the rule was supposed to be two months income.

I guess Jeff doesn't really love his new wife.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ. Two months' income is so insane. I'd be pissed if my boyfriend bought me a ring that expensive.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Two months is what DeBeirs, the assholes who hold a monopoly on diamonds, arbitrarily told people to spend on a diamond.

Ultimately it should be what makes both parties happy.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Originally in the they said it was one months' salary. They then upped it two months. And they then upped it Three months

You can also see in the article that they hoard about 60% of the world's diamonds. De Beers is a corrupt company sitting on top of a corrupt system built on blood and death.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

When I still loved her, I got my ex an engagement that was about two days salary tbh. She had many faults, but that's about the only thing she never gave me shit for.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

My partner and i bought our own rings. Someone else might have gotten it wrong.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you might not mind too much if you lived in a time when women didn't have their own bank accounts or source of income not controlled by their husbands. it was actually a decent rule when it was the only thing of real value you truly owned and could sell if you needed to gtfo of an abusive relationship or give you a bit of breathing room if you were widowed suddenly (and your husband's family decided not to take care of you once he was gone).

but yes, now a days is definitely overkill.

[–] Underwire@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Like abused wives can easily escape and do their life without repercussions. It isn't a rule to favor abused wives.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My ass was confused there's a different category for wedding rings that has this generally insane pricing. There are a lot of other ways to show a partner they are special. Like a memorable trip for two somewhere nice can go well under that.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Like a memorable trip for two somewhere nice

This 1,000,000x time more than some expensive piece of metal and rock

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

jeffery is not capable of human emotions like love and empathy

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The actual number is 0.000021, or 0.0021%. If you make $50,000 a year, 0.000021 is just $1.05. Bezos spending $5 million on a ring has the same effect on his net wealth as our 50k per year guy spending $1.05 on a wedding ring.

Cheap fucker didn't even come close to spending two months salary on his big love.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Quickest, simplest fix would be to treat borrowing against unrealized capital gains as income for tax purposes.

[–] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The system as it is cannot continue this way. Something must break.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can I suggest the necks of all billionaires?

[–] gurnu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing will change until the rich and rightwingers are all killed

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Hey. They dont all need to be killed.

Lots of them are old as fuck or prone to doing stupid shit. They could just die passively. Heart attacks from too much old. Contaminated blood boy. Unforseeable accident while sunning his balls in the bed of his cybertruck while it's in full self driving. Bad (drunken) load on the gun he has literally never cleaned because cleaning is gay.

Fingers crossed, but im not optimistic that will be the first thing.

It will. But it will disproportionately affect the poor.

Hoping it will be the necks of the wealthy, confident it will be sonething bigger and more precious.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand how more people aren't upset by this. I guess that's why they installed Trump, to keep us mad about everything else...

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Some people live under the delusion that they'll become billionaires someday. They project themselves that far ahead. Oblivious.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 39 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Earned on the backs of working class.

Did Amazon ever acknowledge or deign to negotiate with the unions formed by their workers?

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You must pee in a bottle and process a package in 25 seconds...... For the prosperity of Bezos.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

For the prosperity of Bezos.

That sounded like a legit chant.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Sorry, warehouse is closed.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago

The rich are thieves that steal from us, our kids, our future!

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Current net worth you mean?

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Raisin network on average.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I want to learn how to increase my net raisin.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

Luigi... Luigi what? Does anybody remember that name?

Damn, her ring is a hundred times less than their ride?

If I do the math with my five hundred dollar ranger that’s about a ring pop.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

TCP/IP? IPX? Arcnet? Token ring?

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Only 0.000021%. It seems you accidentally threw in an extra zero.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

The fact an order of magnitude made functionally no difference is ridiculous.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's actually three zeros off.

It's 0.0021%

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Damn, you're right. I forgot to account for the conversion to %.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Order of magnitude better. Three orders of magnitudes better once you also fix the misuse of percentages.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Dam that's an expensive doorbell

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What does Bernie mean by real tax rate? How is he calculating that 1.1%

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dang thanks! Spell correct bitting me hard

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh, I get it. Your network is your net worth.

load more comments
view more: next ›