this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
365 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73939 readers
3517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 149 points 1 week ago (4 children)

GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget when they triple killed it by not enabling Proton support.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

worse, they disabled it. it worked perfectly on proton then they blocked it off.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On the flip side, it's given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design.

At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar's true nature, and you couldn't turn away or say that it's a small alternative game mode.
So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more "modern" GTA releases in that window.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don’t understand why people needed to give them constant money. For real, I played for a minute but never spent a dime. Why buy things when you can achieve them?

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over.

[–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because it's extremely annoying to earn enough money. Payouts are pathetic and things are extremely expensive to push you towards buying money. I didn't spend any money on it thankfully, that's just my reasoning behind it.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People are really weird. Stuff like that makes me not play, but for most it makes them spend. I find those consumers bizarre as hell, but they are the mainstream consumer so we are the weird ones.

[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 5 points 1 week ago

This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the online component easily becomes a profitable sideline. Sarcastically, it's what keeps some game corporation CEOs afford their lifestyles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 120 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They would lose likely 98% of their player base.

maybe the goal is instead to try to get ahead of regulation by implementing a system that is easily bypassed by most kids (like these video based age estimations). Then they can show this to the regulator and be like: "look were already doing everything we can, no need to actually put the regulation in place".

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 26 points 1 week ago

Maybe that actually makes it playable. But who am I kidding?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seriously. Our school had a presentation by a guy about kids and computer usage. The gist of it was: Roblox bad, because of paedophiles. GTA good, because it furthers role playing. Basically the opposite of the age recommendations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 11 points 1 week ago

more like 99%

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

$omething tells me that won't happen

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Isn't GTAV an 18 rated game? So children shouldn't be able to buy it in the first place.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This falls on the parents instead because of dumb laws every one has to deal with this, I just hope that not all countries are this insane:

users in the UK have had to take photos of themselves and upload it to a service that uses AI to guess their age. Or, send in photos of ID such as passports or driving licenses.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The problem needs to be addressed at the root, make making children illegal !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

The point is to make children used to checks.

It's a didactic law.

IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you're into playing devil's advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn't be the first time in history.

It's just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, I loose no functionality when I pirate it?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Wrong. You "lose" the age verification feature.

load more comments (1 replies)

If they roll this out to my country, I'm just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

I might still play them, I just won't buy them, because I'm not doing age verification.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If we're going to government age verification everywhere just get rid of fucking ESRB and content ratings

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If we’re going to government age verification everywhere just get rid of fucking ESRB and content ratings

This is a game made in Scotland, ESRB is a voluntary US based system.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

PEGI, then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can you even call it GTA online if there aren't a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, "N***** and F*****".

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Moms are still getting plenty of action though, right? Wont someone think of the moms!!!!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Maybe I'm dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

They were worried about "the children?" News to me.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

They have way more investors to jerk off and please now

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My mum enjoyed the bonus level in the mall where you could just kill like 100 people as fast as you could.

Her favourite weapon is the flamethrower.

Her first reaction to the game was "that's disgusting", but I let her have a go and suddenly she was toasting a whole crowd and loving every minute of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago

And nothing of worth was lost

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn't want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it even hard ro find someone's SSN anymore?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Not really, the assholes used the last four of it for college emails in the 2000s FFS.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The thing with age verification is that I don't think it's a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

Well, after all maybe it's time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

age verification is just a BS strawman. do you remember when we where young? we would access stuff and find ways to buy stuff. but whenever there was a reasonable but fair gap, it would be much harder to get whatever we wanted: buying weed was so much easier, than buying alcohol (without the appropriate age).

pirating is easy (even i figured it out before having enough money to buy movies & games). so the kids will just pirate that stuff and get their way anyway. age verification at the store makes so much more sense. sure, there are ways to circumvent those. but it is a reasonable stop block.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Parents will just have their kids play on their accounts. This only hurts the average person who now needs to worry about who has that information and how it's secured.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Phew, ok good. A few months ago, when this first leaked, it made it seem like this was going to be used for every country and for the entire game. I have never played GTA online and never will.

The internet is continuing to get worse and worse... also, those comments on the actual article were strangely to pro.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

and i plan to pirate GTA

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

Now my money is going to indie developers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

This will just make me not want to play these games.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope they don't block VPN access.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

They absolutely will

load more comments
view more: next ›