this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
417 points (98.6% liked)

News

30525 readers
3039 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

So hes a Trump supporter but doesn't like Sliwa so he's just going to fund an independent? Lmao.

Its good that he's not just funding Sliwa, looks like a rift is forming in the red party.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Honestly, I'm really liking how this race is shaping up. Adams is refusing to drop out because, well, he can't; the second he loses power he stops being useful to the Trump administration, and then he's vulnerable to prosecution. Cuomo is also staying in because he's a narcissist, and Ackman is willing to throw money at anyone else who wants to run.

So that means the centrist shit-libs and conservative ghouls are splitting their vote between at least two, probably three candidates, while the progressive vote will go entirely to Mamdani. I'm still wary of DNC fuckery, but so far, so good.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fucking seriously.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Those rich people aren't going anywhere. Theres not another New York City. They're not gonna pack up their factories and offices with datacenters and move them elsewhere.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Standard Republican.

[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 11 points 7 hours ago

Anyone who the billionaire hedge fund manager is planning to bankroll is the guy you probably should be voting against.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

So let me get this straight. Current tax law favors billionaires. He’s concerned that progressive policies will target taxing billionaires forcing a mass exodus of billionaires thereby undercutting the tax base. In other words they’re already not paying taxes but taxing them more will make them leave. Make it make sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So they are ok with spending hundreds of millions of dollars, just not in any way that actually improves the city for the people that live in it?

It’s not about the money, it’s just misanthropy.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

"It's not to make sure that I have a lot; it's to make sure that I have a lot more than everyone else. Forever."

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 hours ago

Exactly. The ‘public services’ he wants to save is bribery to avoid paying his fair share. This guy is offering a ‘powerful people’ club membership so he can avoid giving back to a society that enabled his mindblowing fortune. Our system has gotten so used to it he’s totally good with saying it all out loud as if he’s some sort of victim.

Society’s cancer.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

you're doing something right when luigi, zohran got billionaires panties in a wad.

[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 57 points 17 hours ago
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 24 points 15 hours ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 41 points 16 hours ago

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 41 points 17 hours ago

Somebody more left-wing than Mamdani has the chance to do something hilarious

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 252 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 57 points 21 hours ago

Surely this billionaire Trump supporter cares about the interests of democratic voters

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 146 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign.

Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 172 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 37 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What's super ironic to me is that taxing them actually makes them safer because if they pay their fair share people wouldn't want to murder them as much as they do now.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 13 points 15 hours ago

And if they paid as much of a percentage as you or me they'd still have more wealth than they could spend in a hundred lifetimes. When a hoarder can't self-regulate, others have to step in.

That's why taxing the ultra-rich and closing all the loopholes needs to be seen as the compassionate option: it's literally better for everyone. All of society is harmed when the wealth gap further widens...

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They think they can buy enough guards to keep this from happening to them.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 28 minutes ago

They absolutely can not if people finally decide it's time. Guards are good against individuals wanting to fight, not against a mob, or against assassins who really want to kill them. Guards can't stop bullets or bombs, and they can't hold back much more than one person each if those people want through.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

Hollowing out the tax-base? Of what? Billionaires who have turned tax evasion into a sports championship?

In most places in the world, tax is primarily paid by the working people, not by the rich.

Which obviously leaves them with to much money that they squander on anti-citizen political campaigns like this. When they have the money for bribery on that level, they have the money to pax taxes like everyone else.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

You leaving NYC Ackman? Gonna take Wall St. with you?

Fuck off to Ireland, see if I care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Who owns the voting machines? Is the software audited? Are there tabulation servers?

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Electronic voting machines are a free-for-all. TBH, I would feel a helluva lot more comfortable with them if they were regulated at the very least as strictly as the 100K+ Electronic Gaming Machines across the state of Nevada.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

Damn, my hopes for Mamdani just got even higher. Low turnout under ordinary circumstances give high-enthusiasm candidates an advantage, by that enthusiastic base's relative size to the ordinarily voting electorate.

[–] match@pawb.social 29 points 18 hours ago

Gimme a hundred million dollars to lose to Mamdani. Sounds like a cushy gig.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 72 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A billionaire just causally announcing that he can influence, finance and promote an election using his money in order to get what only interests themselves ... rather than in allowing democratic processes elect someone the people actually want and need.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

All that money spent against them when they could idk just stop being little shits and pay their fair share. With interest of course

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 90 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

wtf? Is this really the route they're going to take? I know, pay your fucking share of taxes and then there wouldn't be a "hollowing out."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 101 points 22 hours ago

Billionaires should not exist.

[–] pawnfuture@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

The racist republicans currently have the president of hells angels a biker gang responsible for coordinated killings, meth trafficking and sales. The gerontocracy of DNC is frightened and the GOP know this shift is their fault. Let it rain.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

Sounds like he is a frightened douche-canoe. Fuck that guy.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 71 points 21 hours ago

This is the biggest endorsement Mamdani could get. I hope New Yorkers are paying attention.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Okay, but Cuomo spent triple what Zohran spent, and got his ass kicked.

Tell you what, just distribute all that money to your employees, and the result of the election will be the same as if you blew it all on a loser.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 62 points 21 hours ago

Billionaires hate him, genocide enablers hate him, fascists hate him, Nazis hate him, government criminals hate him, citizen concerned for fellow citizens love him.

This Texan Jew is about to send some donations to a Yankee antisemite.
*references to antisemitism are sarcasm based on comments from people who apparently loooove fascism*

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 17 hours ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

load more comments
view more: next ›