this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
1071 points (99.3% liked)

Tech Support Memes

3099 readers
58 users here now

Memes about IT and computer related things, funny screenshots, or things you see out in the wild.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 134 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They are right. Teams sucks.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 117 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nevertheless, in-office sucks far, far worse.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 85 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

WFH was the only good thing that covid brought, so ofc they wanna take that away.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

WFH is good. Teams sucks. I feel like there HAS to be something, anything better because Teams simply can't be the best there is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jessicablaze@lemmynsfw.com 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

At least they're finally being honest about Teams. Now they can fix it.....right?......they will fix it right?

[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

If by "fix" you mean "insert a buy premium Teams now!" button, then sure.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Teams is inferior to contracting Herpes, it’s a low bar

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd like to trade my having to use Teams for 1 herpes, please and thank you.

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I get the lip kind. You would probably prefer to use Teams.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah at least teams will be abandoned software eventually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Zoom also makes their folks work on site.

Guess they don’t like their own dog food

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the company my BIL works at wanted the IT staff to drive into the office, to then login remotely to customer servers. Go figure.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Let the punishment fit the crime

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 67 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Management lives in a fantasy world of vibes and bullshit. They don't care about the workers, the product, or the users. They are insulated from consequences.

The mega corporations need to be broken up, and replaced by smaller, worker-owned, organizations.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I work for a fairly large company and I'm constantly surprised by how much shit I do just does not matter. Me and a coworker have been working on a large project and have had to push it back several times now so that we are almost 3 months behind at this point and there are 0 consequences because none of the bigwigs are affected by it. Then as soon as someone high enough on the chain decides to give a shit half or organization will be expected to drop everything else and get it done.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Last year I busted my ass on a project with a pricetag measured in millions. 6 months later as we were finalizing the build and about to present it to the stakeholders was the moment executive leadership changed their minds and decided they didn't want it after all. We shelved the code and will probably never use it for anything else because it was extremely specific to that project, so unless someone in executive leadership decides they want the same thing again, it's just millions spent for literally nothing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It’s the developer way. Being in office means that the team will never live with the consequences of their shit code. They’ll never fix the 10 things that annoy people every day because they don’t use it. But hey, at least they can all go to lunch together.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

at least they can all go to lunch together.

Until they get a new manager who decides they have to stagger their lunch breaks

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Realistically, Teams would still get tons of use from people using the IM function so they don't have to leave their desk, and the video chat function to facilitate meetings between coworkers in different offices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

From what I've learned by working in top heavy product teams vs slimmer developer teams. The basis for this "in-office leads to productivity" mentality is:

  • People who's job uses meetings as their main tool, want these meetings to be in person, and push for a lot of otherwise unnecessary meetings. These meetings, are, of course, more effectively conducted in person.

  • People who's job is ultimately to do the work, want to avoid unnecessary meeting. The work that needs doing, can be done more effectively, with fewer distractions, higher quality of life, less environmental impact from the commute, etc, from home.

The pandemic showed that productivity increased when people worked from home. What you can deduce from that, would be unpleasant for all those in the former category.

[–] chillhelm@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My wife would be in the former category (PO for the biggest software product in her company). Some days she has meetings back to back for 8h straight.

She hates in person meetings. According to her:

  • Online/hybrid meetings are easier to keep on schedule (both starts and finishes are often delayed)
  • In person meetings more often go off topic
  • back to back meetings means going from one meeting room to another in person, sometimes in another building. That same time can instead be used to take notes/prepare the next meeting when you don't have to walk anywhere and just click a button to be In the next call
  • when a meeting turns out to be irrelevant or useless to you, it is socially not acceptable to get up and leave. Just not having your camera on and doing other work on the side works without anyone knowing

In person work is only for when companies don't trust their employees. This is also true for people whose main work tool is meetings.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

She sounds like a great PO. Especially if she is aware and encourages that last point.

I'm currently losing my mind where going to the office is being praised on a weekly basis as this excellent way to increase productivity. At the same time as I'm spending about 90% of time on meetings. They don't realise that the underlying problem is a dysfunctional management, and exactly what you're describing, as a trust issue. More than half the meetings are unnecessary, and disguised micromanagement.

back to back meetings means going from one meeting room to another in person, sometimes in another building

Lol I used to work as a contractor for a small company at the Comcast Center HQ in Philadelphia. We had the gig producing Comcast's mobile apps. One day my boss emailed me and said we were going to meet with Time Warner Cable to talk about handling their mobile apps as well. When he showed up I started to put my coat on and he said "what are you doing?" We then took the elevator up to the 16th floor ... where TWC had an actual suite of fucking offices in the Comcast Center. The subsequent announcement of the merger between Comcast and TWC was no surprise to me, at least.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is a class war of sorts, between middle management and the workers.

Got it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'll go one step further and say: Developers working from home have better jobs than their managers. The work/life balance, responsibility, and ratio of all that to salary, are practically off the chart compared to how most managers operate. It's a handful of meetings a day, with hours of uninterrupted creative work, and enough leeway to do chores and errands without impacting productivity. It's the ultimate perk.

Meanwhile, management via remote is practically no different than in-person, since virtual meetings and in-person meetings take the same time out of your day. Often, you can't get away from your home office since you don't get enough time between meetings to go do other stuff. And for people that are hot garbage at video conferencing and email, they tend to perform worse than in-person.

So what we're seeing here is professional envy, twisted around as a correcting action of a sort. Keeping everyone in-office means their workday is just as fucked up as their managers.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes and no. There's a certain amount of passive communication that you.miss out when you're isolated from a team environment. A good team can mitigate this, however, by advocating regular group water-coolers and voice calls / screen-shares rather than emails or teams messages to get or deliver info. Getting a random teams call from a team member is not much different from them scooting their chair over to you.

I'm a huge advocate of letting people work how they are most happy. Some people like office, some like home. Just let people do their thing and figure out how to make it work. If we force people to work within a system that doesn't suit them then you lose out on acquiring good talent and will hemorrhage the talent you have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

People who’s job uses meetings as their main tool,

Are the ones with any say in the mater, that's the problem and is not limited to RTO.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"Let's push EVs to help the environment."

Also: "Let's make everyone go back into the office."

Commuting for jobs that can be effectively done remotely is such an egregious waste of resources and time.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember how much less pollution there was during COVID when everyone was working from home?

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

Look also shipping went down and a few other things. That should also be permanent, we have alternatives but we keep doing the same bullshit for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Corporate: "Everyone must be in office to encourage in-person discussion and cross-team collaboration."
Also Corporate: "Is this discussion documented anywhere?"

No, you twat. It was discussed in person.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Advocating person to person contact for higher productivity, while at the same time celebrating less personal contact because A.I. can take over support calls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Seriously, what are my options if I want to migrate to something less insane? Our small team today uses Teams, SharePoint and many of the MS 365 Business Premium tools they offer.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you don’t mind self hosting Mattermost is a pretty great replacement. Comes with some neat productivity tools and integrates with a lot of services including Microsoft stuff.

You can even have a bridge to Teams so you can set it up for the sort of nerds who appreciate full Markdown support with syntax highlighting.

To sell it to your boss, just say “If Teams is down, how will we get it working again?”

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Here's the thing.... I work in IT and.... As much as many people don't want to hear it, Microsoft puts everything in one basket, and makes it easy to access and handle that basket.

You could go with gsuite/Google workspaces, and they have a lot of competing tools, like drive, meet, chat, Gmail, and their own office style suite.

Beyond that, you're going to start breaking up services between providers. Dropbox, email, zoom, etc... Each with their own logins per member of the team, increasing complexity exponentially.... Unless you can federate all your logins with someone, but the major players in business-ready, federated logins is.... Microsoft, Google, and companies like Ookla, of all people.

Which isn't to say anything about the compatibility issues with federation, and the complexity of setting it up when it works.

I struggled through trying to get federation working between a lot of different solutions and I'll just say, the whole thing is a nightmare, unless it's designed to go together from the start. You only get that if you go all in on one provider.... Like Microsoft 365.

People can say what they want, but Microsoft has taken their decades of experience making active directory, scaled it up to azure active directory (now entra ID), and built a full scale cloud service suite with everything fully integrated, and bluntly, simple to deploy by comparison. In the past, there were quite a few services, apps, programs, etc that directly interfaced with AD. Now that same functionality is a part of the foundations of entra.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

My last company went to Zoom, funny enough, months before COVID hit and we all went WFH. I was the administrator and was thrilled with it. We used Google for identity management, clicked right in with some simple setup. Not sure how it plays with your MS ecosystem, but I'd bet money it's every bit as easy to tie your MS accounts to it.

We had a few clients and vendors that would suck us into Teams and Google meets and they fucking sucked. I honestly can't remember a single complaint I had with Zoom's software. Tech support was superb at the start, dropped drastically once they exploded in size with WFH and COVID. No idea how it stands now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

They don't even dogfood their own technology. Why should you pay for their stuff?

[–] msage@programming.dev 18 points 2 weeks ago

There is no logical argument supporting this claim.

It's always layoffs.

[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The whole force return to office thing is just a "we own you" moment from leadership. It doesn't have to make sense for them. And I'll bet you that the leadership will continue to enjoy remote work benefits. I was recently ordered back to office. The problem is I don't actually work with or report to any of the folks at that office. So I'm just going to an office to sit on teams calls with my coworkers instead or staying home and doing the same thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Microsoft Teams is such a bad product that Microsoft needs all engineers back in the office 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troybot@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

What I'm gathering from this article is that the Teams team has teams on Teams

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 8 points 2 weeks ago

So these assholes made Teams so bad they had to go back into office, and then they make it everyone else's problem?

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Meanwhile, my company was asking us why do we even want an office, can't we all just work from home? That was years before the pandemic (when Google bought the building we were leasing and the company had to find a new one).

So as soon as the first lockdown happened they immediately closed the office and said everyone is fully remote now. They did give us money to set up a home office, but overall they saved a ton by getting out of an expensive rent (I've heard $1m/yr) and getting rid of all the perks we had in office (free breakfast and lunch, snacks, beer and kombucha on tap, unlimited coffee, gym membership, etc.). I don't imagine them ever deciding to go back to that.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"As an example, if Josh says something stupid over Teams, I can't throw a water bottle at him."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's worthwhile mentioning that not only did Microsoft buy a superior solution, Skype, but let it languish and ultimately threw it away in favor of Teams.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

Teams killed my parents.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm an industrial electrician, they make me use teams to talk to the office wanks. Kill me.

load more comments
view more: next ›